info on this remington mohawk please....

[chet]

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=218&ad ... winchester

link is to a local classified site.

looks like a 673 guide gun to me, though I've never held one.
Is this a good buy? I've never heard of a mohawk, so I figured i'd ask here first.

 

[DrMike]

A handy little rifle that didn't survive. The 673 was modelled after the 660 and 600, the 600 following the 660.

(http://www.remington.com/products/archived/centerfire/bolt-action/model-660.aspx)

(http://www.remington.com/products/archived/centerfire/bolt-action/mohawk-600.aspx)

Other information that may help in making a decision can be found here:

http://guns.wikia.com/wiki/Mohawk_600

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_a_remington_model_600_308_caliber_rifle_worth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_Model_600

 

[6mm Remington]

Chet the one in the center was mine and is now my son's. It is a Remington Model 600 Centennial Model made in 1964. My father purchased it brand new after it sat in a store for a few years. It is chambered in 6mm Remington and celebrates the 100th year of the Montana Territorial Centennial and the 75th year of Statehood. There were 1020 of these made and the number on this one is MC0570.

I cannot speak for all of them, but this one really shoots well. From what I have read, they are great shooters. This one has taken an awful lot of deer and antelope over the years. I love that gun. My son has shot his first antelope with it as well. He got two his very first year with it.

I think you would like the rifle. In a 308 it won't buck too badly and they are handy and light to carry. There was a recall on the safety on them many years ago, and Remington will fix that problem for free.

David

 

[Ridge_Runner]

rifle in the add is not a mohawk, mohawks had I think no checkering, hardwood stock, not walnut, and definately no rib. pretty good buy IMO for a model 600 carbine
http://www.remington.com/products/archi ... k-600.aspx
http://www.remington.com/products/archi ... rbine.aspx
RR

 

[PJGunner]

That is the first version of the Remington 600. It was replaced by the M660 where the prettied (?) up the stock a bit with a black forearn tip and while line spacers, a 20" barrel and dumped that silly ventilated rib. The 600 Mohawk was similar to the original M600 but was without that impressed checkering and the ventilated rib was also left out. I had the Mohawk in .308 Win. and the M660, also in .308 but I kept the 660. Muzzle blast was vicious in both rifles. My 660 accounts for the majority of the Mule Deer I took while living in Nevada. They are neat rifles even if they do have that funny dog leg bolt. :lol:
Paul B.

 

[SJB358]

That is the first version of the Remington 600. It was replaced by the M660 where the prettied (?) up the stock a bit with a black forearn tip and while line spacers, a 20" barrel and dumped that silly ventilated rib. The 600 Mohawk was similar to the original M600 but was without that impressed checkering and the ventilated rib was also left out. I had the Mohawk in .308 Win. and the M660, also in .308 but I kept the 660. Muzzle blast was vicious in both rifles. My 660 accounts for the majority of the Mule Deer I took while living in Nevada. They are neat rifles even if they do have that funny dog leg bolt. :lol:
Paul B.

I would love to have one of them Dog Legged 350 Rem Mags though!

 

[Ridge_Runner]

That is the first version of the Remington 600. It was replaced by the M660 where the prettied (?) up the stock a bit with a black forearn tip and while line spacers, a 20" barrel and dumped that silly ventilated rib. The 600 Mohawk was similar to the original M600 but was without that impressed checkering and the ventilated rib was also left out. I had the Mohawk in .308 Win. and the M660, also in .308 but I kept the 660. Muzzle blast was vicious in both rifles. My 660 accounts for the majority of the Mule Deer I took while living in Nevada. They are neat rifles even if they do have that funny dog leg bolt. :lol:
Paul B.

I would love to have one of them Dog Legged 350 Rem Mags though!

had one for years in a 660, then my wifes uncle wanted it way more than me.
RR

 

[JD338]

A friend of mine has 2 of them, one in 308 Win and the other in 350 Rem Mag. Both are shooters.


Scotty, my friend has been thinking of selling the 350 Rem Mag. He bought the 700 Classic 350 Rem Mag from Fotis last year.

JD338

 

[SJB358]

A friend of mine has 2 of them, one in 308 Win and the other in 350 Rem Mag. Both are shooters.


Scotty, my friend has been thinking of selling the 350 Rem Mag. He bought the 700 Classic 350 Rem Mag from Fotis last year.

JD338

Let me know if you ever hear anything more Jim..

 

[onesonek]

"I would love to have one of them Dog Legged 350 Rem Mags though!"

That would be cool!!! I could see having one in that chambering as well.

 

[Elkman]

great to carry, kicks like hell, muzzle blast is also significant, especially in 350. My worst eyebrow cut was with one of these little darlings. I atill have it, but prefer the Whelen.

 

[Ridge_Runner]

great to carry, kicks like hell, muzzle blast is also significant, especially in 350. My worst eyebrow cut was with one of these little darlings. I atill have it, but prefer the Whelen.

the kick from mine didn't seem excessive, not as bad as a 308 600.
RR

 

[Elkman]

Mine is the 350 Mag, short, fat and ugly.

 

[SJB358]

You might have to bring it out Bill. I imagine it would be a little bit of a handful....

 

[glane5910]

That is the first version of the Remington 600. It was replaced by the M660 where the prettied (?) up the stock a bit with a black forearn tip and while line spacers, a 20" barrel and dumped that silly ventilated rib. The 600 Mohawk was similar to the original M600 but was without that impressed checkering and the ventilated rib was also left out. I had the Mohawk in .308 Win. and the M660, also in .308 but I kept the 660. Muzzle blast was vicious in both rifles. My 660 accounts for the majority of the Mule Deer I took while living in Nevada. They are neat rifles even if they do have that funny dog leg bolt. :lol:
Paul B.

I would love to have one of them Dog Legged 350 Rem Mags though!

I've got one that's absolute mint..

 

[SJB358]

That is the first version of the Remington 600. It was replaced by the M660 where the prettied (?) up the stock a bit with a black forearn tip and while line spacers, a 20" barrel and dumped that silly ventilated rib. The 600 Mohawk was similar to the original M600 but was without that impressed checkering and the ventilated rib was also left out. I had the Mohawk in .308 Win. and the M660, also in .308 but I kept the 660. Muzzle blast was vicious in both rifles. My 660 accounts for the majority of the Mule Deer I took while living in Nevada. They are neat rifles even if they do have that funny dog leg bolt. :lol:
Paul B.

I would love to have one of them Dog Legged 350 Rem Mags though!

I've got one that's absolute mint..

Pictures are always a crowd pleaser! :lol:

 

[glane5910]

I'll get some pics soon, I'm thinking about putting it on gunbroker..

 

[DrMike]

glane5910,

You have a very desirable rifle. I have no doubt that there are many who will want that. The itch to own was alleviated somewhat by the Remington 673, but it has never fully abated.

 

[6mm Remington]

great to carry, kicks like hell, muzzle blast is also significant, especially in 350. My worst eyebrow cut was with one of these little darlings. I atill have it, but prefer the Whelen.

the kick from mine didn't seem excessive, not as bad as a 308 600.
RR

Now the little 6mm still barks, but not bad for the shooter, just the person to either side of you, but it doesn't bite. Really mild recoil unlike you big bullet bullies are getting. :mrgreen:
David

 

[glane5910]

Some pics of the 350 Rem Mag. Pics are from cell this am so I'll try and get better ones with my regualr camera when I get more time.