sithlord6512":2lfeig2f said:The posts have me reconsidering my approach. I've always striven for accuracy first and velocity second. However, perhaps my quarry and my-self imposed parameters (less than 250 yards) suggest less than optimum accuracy in favor of greater velocity is the way to go - I mean the vital area on a moose must be at least 15" in diameter - theoretically even groups of 6" @ 100 yards should be accurate enough - some of my 168 TTSXs loads where in the 1.5-2" ranges (but again velocities kinda slow-ish - not what monometals like). I will start checking out 180 PTs.
While I don't think there is alot wrong with your current load for the ranges you are talking about, I agree with the others, there are better. Have you tried out the 165 AB with RL15 in your 308?
I did a real quick and dirty workup with my wifes 308 Ruger. It hasn't even been a particularly awesome rifle for me. It shoots, but it isn't a bug hole shooter. Well, I think with a bit of barrel channel relief, it could be a great load.
45 grains RL15
45.5 RL15
46.0 RL15
These are using WW cases, CCI BR2 primers and SAAMI seating depth.
While they don't look awesome by any stretch of the imagination, they seem to be pretty consistent across the powder column and run right around 2800 with 46 grains out of her 22" barrel. That load, as it sits would be okay with me for any moose.
Good luck with your load work. 180's might be okay as well, but the 165 seems to really shine in the 308. Well built bullets such as the PT's or AB's would work pretty awesome on moose. Gotta think moose were probably killed by the trainloads with 300 Savages and lesser powered rounds for a long time.