hodgeman":b03k3oca said:hunternyny":b03k3oca said:T Educate me on why several here have said 308 and not 30-06 as I believe I would lean toward the 30-06, for myself and my wife thank you
It's a lot harder to find a .30-06 with stock dimensions that fit small statured folks than it is to find a .308 that's suitable.
Lots of "youth and ladies" rifles in short action cartridges, not so many in long actions.
Another point for the .308 vs .30-06 for youth/ladies, and what I believe is the primary reason for short action ladies/youth rifles, is the short action bolt throw. With a full length stock, you nearly need to break cheek weld with a long action to cycle the bolt. Take off 1-2" of LOP to properly size the stock for a smaller statured shooter, and you definitely do. Not so with the .308. That was the reason I went with a .308 for my wife's first rifle, also the reason I'd select such calibers as .250-3000, .260, 6.5 creed, 6.5x55 in an intermediate length, 7-08, .308 over .25-06, .270, 30-06. Nothing to do with the ballistics or recoil of the rounds. I believe the Blaser rifles get around this difficulty with their bolt/magazine configuration, perhaps somebody more knowledgeable in these can chime in on that. I would love to see a .270 bore non-magnum short action round made commercial, but with the dominance of the 6.5 Creed and 7-08 in the American market, that is unlikely.