- Thread starter
- #41
joelkdouglas
Handloader
- Jun 5, 2011
- 1,310
- 3
Alright gents, I'm back from the range.
First, it was in the mid-70s when I started shooting. No wind for about 30 minutes, but then the wind picked up a bit and we probably had winds of 15 gusting to 25 or so. For sure nothing I wouldn't go hunting in.
I started shooting with a Bull's Bag (wanted to have a solid rest), and then moved back to the S-BR Harris Bipod. Interestingly enough, the groups were better off the bipod. And my groups were improved today over previous trips. A possible explanation for the improved groups is I lightened my trigger pull from 4 lbs to 3 lbs this week. I believe that's probably why my groups shrank from the normal 1.5 inches.
Pictures are posted below. Each picture is annotated with the powder charge and the 2nd or 3rd string. Both the 57.0 and 57.6 first strings were 1 inch groups, off a Bull's Bag, centered around the aim point. I've also posted a picture of my rifle per Dr Mike's request. She's nothing special, but she kills deer or elk every year. The rifle and scope (Leupold 3.5-10 x 40 VX-3) are 8 years old, the trigger (Timney) is 4 years old, and the stock (HS Precision) is new this year.
All ammo was: Lapua .30-06 brass, CCI LR200 primers, 168 grain Nosler Custom Competition bullets, and IMR 4350. The two powder groups that performed best were 57.0 grains and 57.6 grains.
My question is even though the 57.6 grain powder groups were smaller, would you choose the 57.0 grain group because it was always closer to the aiming point? By the third string the rifle was probably a bit too hot, and a bit too dirty, but the 57.0 group never strayed as far away from the aim point as any other group. But the groups were not the smallest.
Opinions?
View attachment 57.0 grains 2nd string.jpg
View attachment 57.0 grains 3rd string.jpg
View attachment 57.6 grains 2nd string.jpg
View attachment 57.6 grains 3rd string.jpg
View attachment Remington 700 BDL .30-06.jpg
First, it was in the mid-70s when I started shooting. No wind for about 30 minutes, but then the wind picked up a bit and we probably had winds of 15 gusting to 25 or so. For sure nothing I wouldn't go hunting in.
I started shooting with a Bull's Bag (wanted to have a solid rest), and then moved back to the S-BR Harris Bipod. Interestingly enough, the groups were better off the bipod. And my groups were improved today over previous trips. A possible explanation for the improved groups is I lightened my trigger pull from 4 lbs to 3 lbs this week. I believe that's probably why my groups shrank from the normal 1.5 inches.
Pictures are posted below. Each picture is annotated with the powder charge and the 2nd or 3rd string. Both the 57.0 and 57.6 first strings were 1 inch groups, off a Bull's Bag, centered around the aim point. I've also posted a picture of my rifle per Dr Mike's request. She's nothing special, but she kills deer or elk every year. The rifle and scope (Leupold 3.5-10 x 40 VX-3) are 8 years old, the trigger (Timney) is 4 years old, and the stock (HS Precision) is new this year.
All ammo was: Lapua .30-06 brass, CCI LR200 primers, 168 grain Nosler Custom Competition bullets, and IMR 4350. The two powder groups that performed best were 57.0 grains and 57.6 grains.
My question is even though the 57.6 grain powder groups were smaller, would you choose the 57.0 grain group because it was always closer to the aiming point? By the third string the rifle was probably a bit too hot, and a bit too dirty, but the 57.0 group never strayed as far away from the aim point as any other group. But the groups were not the smallest.
Opinions?
View attachment 57.0 grains 2nd string.jpg
View attachment 57.0 grains 3rd string.jpg
View attachment 57.6 grains 2nd string.jpg
View attachment 57.6 grains 3rd string.jpg
View attachment Remington 700 BDL .30-06.jpg