Another thing to add to the confusion. I recall when I was younger my dad owning and having issues with his Winchester M100 308. Due to it being a semi automatic 308 and the time frame when he owned it, I believe the powder he used was a faster ball powder that burned dirty. He couldn’t find a way to thoroughly clean it and the carbon built up in the chamber and the spent case would hang up. Almost like a self locking taper in the chamber. He couldn’t find a bore brush that he could get in the chamber and scrub the carbon out without tearing the entire action down. I think he resorted to brake parts cleaner and WD-40. A can each per cleaning and,eventually selling it for a 280 Rem 700 Mountain Rifle. He wasn’t the only one with that problem as the local gunsmith kept busy cleaning M100’s. When the 308 came about in the fifties it had a sharper shoulder and less body taper for the time and showed feeding problems in semi automatic rifles when using some common powders even in the late 70’s and 80’s.
My point: I think we have a lot to thank to powder development for the reasons we can get away with sharp shoulders and little body taper in our cartridge design. Add to that modern processes in gun building and we can get away with murder. Take the 6.5 Creedmoor back to 1950 and chamber it in an era semiautomatic burning the powder of the day and it would quickly be a single shot and the most hated cartridge ever made.
My point: I think we have a lot to thank to powder development for the reasons we can get away with sharp shoulders and little body taper in our cartridge design. Add to that modern processes in gun building and we can get away with murder. Take the 6.5 Creedmoor back to 1950 and chamber it in an era semiautomatic burning the powder of the day and it would quickly be a single shot and the most hated cartridge ever made.