Africa Huntress":pz58nbo4 said:Charlie, I am setting at an airport reading this thread and I find myself feeling a bit worried as I head for my next hunt using the the old and outdated 300 and 375 H & H.. Charlie or Scotty or anyone, could someone please print out the ballistics and trajectory of the 35 whelen and the 340 weatherby for me. Being a simple country girl I think I missed something. Keep it simple for me, say a 200 or 225 gr with what the Velocity, energy, and trajectory would be at say 300 yards Please compare apples to apples--dont hand load one to the max and store buy the other. Just curious thank you
A, I did exactly that on another thread not too long ago, just for grins as Sean asked me to do the same thing. I don't think there is enough difference to 300 yards to make a difference. There is a difference, I am not debating that one bit, but energy and trajectory really are pretty close, as you push out to 400+, the 340 takes over cause of sleeker bullets and such, but out to 300, even the best rifleman on here would have a hard time showing a distinct advantage.
I actually am a fan of the 340's ballistics. But, I wanna capitalize on it for longer shooting, and well, it is different. I think I ran the table for 225's in the 338-06 and 250's in the 340 Wby and 35 Whelen. I know you love your H&H and you should, but the Whelen is a hard cartridge to argue with with 250's around 2600 or so. I think most of the difference on them all is the nut behind the gun, not the cartridge loaded in the chamber.
I found it
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=19890&p=185054&hilit=35+Whelen#p185054
You'll have to do a little reading, but it is all there.