I never really understood the draw for a 280 Ackley improved vs. A straight 280. You get 2.6 grains more powder availability, but at the cost of taking a marginally available cartridge, and making it even more marginally marginal. Does that extra powder space get used often?
I went with the .284win, which looked like a great bet in 1988, but turns out to be the champion of marginality
In any case, two weeks ago when I was shopping at Cabela's and Sportsman's Warehouse, both of them had bags of 280 AI brass for sale on the floor, as well as dies. They also had 280 Remington, but it seems like everywhere I looked I saw 280 AI, including numerous guns I looked at being chambered in it. I never would have thought it 30 years ago, but it seems like 280 AI is almost more popular than 280 REM now.
I went with the .284win, which looked like a great bet in 1988, but turns out to be the champion of marginality
In any case, two weeks ago when I was shopping at Cabela's and Sportsman's Warehouse, both of them had bags of 280 AI brass for sale on the floor, as well as dies. They also had 280 Remington, but it seems like everywhere I looked I saw 280 AI, including numerous guns I looked at being chambered in it. I never would have thought it 30 years ago, but it seems like 280 AI is almost more popular than 280 REM now.