truck driver
Ammo Smith
- Mar 11, 2013
- 7,319
- 880
Anybody using the silencer ear buds? I'm looking at the ones rated for 25NRR.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Just to be clear, I'm not saying anything bad about the Walker's. Just a preference, is all.Thanks for the info.
I understand, I was looking for how they perform under a shooting range condition were multipool fire arms were being shot at the same time and if they responded and block out or decreased the level of heard noise. Some of the electronics don't react to multipool or consecutive shots well and have slow processors.Just to be clear, I'm not saying anything bad about the Walker's. Just a preference, is all.
Thanks I'll have to see what processor they use.Roger,
Most Noise CX designs use a DSP (Digital Signal Processor) due to its speed which is faster than a microcontroller. The downside to a DSP is cost, usually several times more expensive than an 8 or 16 bit micro.
DSP's are commonly used for noise cancelation and number crunching big blocks of numbers. If the ear buds use a DSP, it's probably a good design.
Hope this helps.
JD338
On their website they don't say if it is DSP or not Just OS-R3110 digital processing.Thanks I'll have to see what processor they use.
Most likely a DSP or 16/32 bit micro with a DSP function.On their website they don't say if it is DSP or not Just OS-R3110 digital processing.
Thanks JD, I revisited why I was looking at these and realized that I didn't care for the Walker products because they don't do what I like in electronic hearing protection. They are good for field work and range work if you are the only one shooting. Also they had separate volume controls even on their muffs so I bought a pair of Peltor 300 tactical muffs with 24NRR.Most likely a DSP or 16/32 bit micro with a DSP function.
JD338