Why No Love for The .308 Winchester

To be perfectly honest, I shunned the .308 from the start considering it to be a 30-06 want to be. I remember when a hunting partner in California bought a .308 when they first came who he was singing the praises of what a great cartridge it was. Frankly, it wasn't until 1973 that I even considered a .308 and that was because being a heavy chain smoker at the time, hunting with friend on 9,500 foot high mountains was taking a heavy toll on me and my 30-06 was getting to be too damned heavy. The only .308 I could find was a Remington 660 so I bit the bullet and bought it. I wasn't too thrilled about that short 20" barrel as it was loud. Not sure about accuracy either as the noise and recoil got a serious flinch going. Later on my kids got me a set of shooting muffs for my birthday and WOW! What happened to the recoil? That was when I started getting decent groups running Winchester factory ammo with 150 gr. bullets. I don't remember if they were Silvertips or Power Points but they shot decent groups.
It was later that year when deer season started that I took that rifle out on its first deer hunt. One of my buddies shot at and wounded a nice 4 point Mule Deer and it was running off. I was about 200 or so yards to the left of my buds when I saw that deer and took a shot even though it was way the hell and gone out yonder. The deer dropped and lay still. My friends came over and we paced it of at 426 paces. At that point in time that was the longest shot I'd ever taken on any game animal. That's when I took a long hard look at the .308.

I have never chronographed any load out of that Remington. I have however chronographed loads from several Ruger M77 RSIs, and a Winchester M70. I did one time chronograph loads from that M70 with 22" barrel with 180 gr. Winchester Power Points. At the same time I ran some 30-06 180 gr. Power points from a Remington M700 BDL with 22" barrel. The .308 was all of 20 FPS faster than the 30-06. THe only real difference was the .308 barrel had a 1 in 12" twist while the 30-06 was 1 in 10". Whether that made a differnce or not is something I cannot answer.

I have read those article by John Wooters and his full stocked SAKO and looked for one for a long time. Never did find one in .308. What I did find was the Ruger RSI and while it took me a long time to fid a usable hunting load for that rifle it has become one of my favorite .308 rifles I own. I had to find another one as my late wife tried to appropriate mine. The only thing I was skeptical about the rifle was the 18.5" barrel. About the best they'll do with my handload is 2550 FPS which is exactly the same as the Speer Nitrex ammo that is no longer available. I used the Speer 165 gr. Hot Core and Speer used the 165 gr. Grand Slam bullet. The longest shot I've taken with the RSI was 250 yards. I probably could have taken 95 percent or better of the shots at game with that load and never had to look back.

I took me a while to come around to liking the .308 but when I did it was a solid liking.
Paul B.
Paul I was like you in trying to find a full stock Sako 308 like Wooters. Put a want to buy ad on 24 hr campfire and got a response. Used it last year on a couple of doe hunts. Dan.
 
Paul I was like you in trying to find a full stock Sako 308 like Wooters. Put a want to buy ad on 24 hr campfire and got a response. Used it last year on a couple of doe hunts. Dan.
Well, then take a look at the Ruger RSI in .308. The barrel is slightly shorter at 18.5" but based on my usage, a tang safety version, it will still slay deer to at least 250 Yards. That's the longest shot I've taken with my RSI rifle.
Paul B.
 
Anyone recognize these ballistics tables?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5762.jpeg
    IMG_5762.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 5
  • IMG_5763.jpeg
    IMG_5763.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 5
  • IMG_5764.jpeg
    IMG_5764.jpeg
    595.8 KB · Views: 5
They are from left to right:
1 - 150 gr .30 cal Ballistic Tip
2 - 165 gr .30 cal Ballistic Tip
3 - 180 gr .30 cal Ballistic Tip
 
Last edited:
As one can see, the 150 gr bullet driven to 2800 fps is good for deer out to 500 yds. The 2900 fps is good for deer out to 550 yds. Either or it has enough steam to take a dear cleanly and humanely.
The 165 gr bullet at 2700 FPS is good for a compromise bullet weight for deer out to 550 yds. For elk 350 yds. But drive it to 2800 FPS and the bullet is good for deer out to 550-575 yds. For elk it’s good out to 450 yds.
The 180 gr bullet driven to 2600 FPS is good for elk out to 350 yds. Let’s drive the same bullet to 2700 FPS and it’s good out to 400 yds. Thats a long ways in elk territory. But the .308 can handle its own with these distances. Not a pipsqueak round in my book!
As Jim and others have demonstrated, the 165 gr bullet is the optimal weight for deer and elk, and also for moose I dare say.
 
Last edited:
i cut my teeth (more like my brow) on a 264wm............................................. optic :ROFLMAO: . yup, optic bite
The first and only time I had scope brow was with a Ruger M 77 in .338 Win Mag. This rifle was actually easier to shoot than my Ruger M 77 in .300 Win Mag. 🤣
 
Back
Top