Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
HAWKEYESATX":1v1e83va said:You're talking about muzzle energy. Not distances like 500 yds and up where the 7mm bullet has a distinct advantage in BC, and SD, not to mention bullet drop.TackDriver284":1v1e83va said:Sorry for being off topic. :mrgreen:HAWKEYESATX":1v1e83va said:The .280 Rem will outclass the .30-06, and .300 Win Mag at over 500 yds distance.
Not to burst your bubble, I was just confused,,,After reading your above post about hard hitting cartridges at long range,,,on this post you simplified that a .280 outclasses the 300 Magnum? How is that possible?
280 Rem has about 2800 to 3000 ft lbs and the .300 Mag has 4000 ft lbs.
Sent from my moto e5 play using Tapatalk
Thank you SJB358SJB358":3ip5wdfe said:Off topic a bit but if you compare the Hornady 180 ELD with a .797 BC started at around 2750 (doable from a correctly set up 280) to a 225 ELD with a .777 BC launched from a 300 Win at 2850 it’s pretty interesting to see the little 280 keep pace... just food for thought..
The 300’s really get into their groove with the heavies.
SJB358":3mfnho7t said:Off topic a bit but if you compare the Hornady 180 ELD with a .797 BC started at around 2750 (doable from a correctly set up 280) to a 225 ELD with a .777 BC launched from a 300 Win at 2850 it’s pretty interesting to see the little 280 keep pace... just food for thought..
The 300’s really get into their groove with the heavies.
Songdog":tqirxjjt said:SJB358":tqirxjjt said:Off topic a bit but if you compare the Hornady 180 ELD with a .797 BC started at around 2750 (doable from a correctly set up 280) to a 225 ELD with a .777 BC launched from a 300 Win at 2850 it’s pretty interesting to see the little 280 keep pace... just food for thought..
The 300’s really get into their groove with the heavies.
I think that’s where guys get in trouble on elk.... when simply looking at “energy” numbers. I’d never shoot an elk with that bullet. Energy doesn’t mean squat when the projectile isn’t up to the task.
160 AccuBond vs. 180/200 grain AccuBond is a good comparison if we’re talking elk bullets outta the 7mm vs. .300...
350JR":2a2hmd4d said:Opinions vary.
Blkram":t3klbdvl said:Out playing with the LH Sako 85 Hunter again today!
Mounted a Swarovski Z5 3.5-18x44 on it and was shooting Nosler's 140gr AB ammo.
3 shot groups as small as 0.516" at 100 yards. A little vertical stringing consistent with each group; will check action screws' tension.
Such a pleasant rifle to shoot!
Not as small of groups as the HSM 140 gr Berger ammo, but is good enough for hunting in my neck of the woods!
Need to try a recipe using Re-26 with the 140 gr AB's. Any QL recipes with Nosler brass, F210M primers in a 24" barrel?
Agreed, the 6.5x55 is a superb calibre,if it floats your boat, but has it's limitations, I too am a .30 cal man through and through, why risk a marginal calibre on something like a big animal in terms of a moose, in fact, in Sweden the minimum calibre to shoot a moose is the 6.5x55 so I dispute the above statement from above poster, the .30 cals account for for moose in Swedenfilmjunkie4ever":252rv5cg said:Bash74":252rv5cg said:I cant comment hunting with 6.5 since I only use it for local competitions and long range fun on metal. Grew up using 300 and 30.06 for all hunting. I do not think I will ever really go away from them 2 for hunting.
That’s where I’m at. If a 6.5 floats your boat well have at it. I’m a .30 cal man through and through.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rangers13":1xmldmds said:The 6.5 is a great round. I enjoy shooting it. I have a Ruger 6.5 and it’s accurate out to 1400 yards. Of course you need a great scope too accomplish that. So I picked up the Vortex Razor HD AMG. Great scope. Well worth it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk