Griffbl
There is no Replacement for Placement.
- Sep 7, 2025
- 29
- 28
my thoughts too Guy.....thank youInteresting...
I've no need for it, but it's interesting anyway.
Guy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
my thoughts too Guy.....thank youInteresting...
I've no need for it, but it's interesting anyway.
Guy
the photo looks like it could be the case, (no pun intended) but no leakage. case is still airtight. Just FYI.Looks like some gas leakage around that primer as well
looks very similar indeed to anProbably higher than that.
THE NEXT ISSUE WILL BE HAVING THE ABILITY TO RELOAD...................NOT SURE IF FED GOT ALL THE KINKS WORKED OUT OF THAT PROCESS YET
Spot on TexasLife...that is exactly the idea....said another way, it was to duplicate a 7mm PRC in a smaller case ,and with a 20" barrel. Exceeds velocity of a 7mm PRC when both using 24" barrels...again, that was the IDEA.THE BIG DIFFERENCE IS SUPPOSED TO BE WITH 15K EXTRA PSI ON MAX FOR THE ADVANTAGE ON SMALLER CAPACITY CASES. NOTHING DIFFERENT THAN THE 277FURY, BUT W/O THE 2-PIECE CASE. SURE YOU CAN GET THE SAME VELOCITIES WITH THE SAME BARREL LENGTH OF THE 7BC, BUT REQUIRES A LARGER CAPACITY CASE.............WORKS FOR ME. THEM GOING WITH A 20" IS FOR THE PEOPLE THAT USE SUPPRESSORS TO SAVE ON LENGTHS.
Spot on TexasLife...that is exactly the idea....said another way, it was to duplicate a 7mm PRC in a smaller case ,and with a 20" barrel. Exceeds velocity of a 7mm PRC when both using 24" barrels...again, that was the IDEA.
I agree...looks very similar indeed dimensionally to a .280 AI.While it sounds crazy, I’d have to guess Federal has done some homework.
The idea of an 06 case making 28 Nosler speed in an 06 sized rifle sounds like something I’d love to have elk hunting. Time will tell. I heard the case is reload able so that’s a plus.
Heard there are 12-13 makers lined up to chamber them after it’s official.
Gotta admit, a 170 grain Terminal Ascent at 3150 from a 7 1/2 pound all up rifle sounds like a complete hammer, but a feather to carry. Mainly those are the ballistics that led me to the Mashburn Super, but I’m a pound heavier and a round less in the mag of said cartridge.
i wish they'd give psi results on their max loads per powders.My original post has now been updated with comments from Federal Ammunition AND with loading data which I will post again here. If I need to move the update down here at the bottom of this thread, please advise. I combined it to simply have all the information in one post. thank you all.
Load data per Federal: https://www.federalpremium.com/on/d...try-Reloading-Data-Sheet_web-disclaimer-2.pdf
Agreed! from what i have read about Ramshot in the '06, that sounds like a promising start given Federal's data IF I were to ever load this thing....we will see what happens with Federal's replacement ammunition.i wish they'd give psi results on their max loads per powders.
I seem to remember when Weatherby started to chamber the 338 Lapua in the MarkV people were having issues with Hornady brass sticking in the chamber. They must cut their chambers on the tight side.The Rifle Manufacturer (again, in my example Weatherby) i.e. an incorrectly cut chamber or reamer of incorrect dimensions.
Thank you so much. Me too. I will post results when new ammunition arrives.I seem to remember when Weatherby started to chamber the 338 Lapua in the MarkV people were having issues with Hornady brass sticking in the chamber. They must cut their chambers on the tight side.
Hopefully the newer ammo will solve your issue.
I'm eyeing up a Weatherby 307 Alpine in it. I just got two new rifles this year for hunting that I never carried yet, it's hard to get a third but I am very intrigued.