.277 130 Accubond

Dan, Scotty is all over it. I am using RL-22. I worked up to 61 grains for my rifle.

Sorry for the slow response. I've been dedicating my spare time to putting my four wheeled toy back together. Good luck wit the load development. The 130 AB's liked a lot of jump in my rifle.

-Trevor

Also, I've seen pretty strong correlation in performance between bullets recovered from water jugs and bullets recovered from deer. I haven't recovered enough from either to make any scientific conclusions, though.
 
Trevor here is a 165 gr. AccuBond from water jugs at 25 yards.

Bullettests-5-4-12026.jpg


Here is a 180 gr. AccuBond from an elk at 90 yards. My son shot this with his 300 WSM.

180grAccubond-ELK-300WSM003.jpg


I think that the water jugs give a pretty fair comparison really. It's cheap, fun, and something we all can do with different bullets so we have an accurate comparison as we are all shooting into the same thing.
 
Hi there all members.
I am a new comer here and it is my pleasure.
recently I purchased 2 lots of Nosler 130gr. AB. for my 270win rifle.
I am a little confused by this long bullet as I used to reload Sierra or Hornady ,because of unavailability of Nosler AB or BT etc.
my questions is around it's Max. CAOL in my rifle without touching rifling without or any pressure.
I gauged it yesterday and really amazing , it touched the rifling around 86.70mm, while my magazine Max. length is about 83.80mm .
I must back the bullet in what accurate CAOL and not losing my accuracy.
I chrono 2850fps with 83mm CAOL with Sierra pro hunter 130gr. with44gr. IMR 4895.
Bests
Rami
If you don't mind , also email me on rami27088@yahoo.com your valuable remarks and comments...
 
Welcome aboard buddy. I wouldn't worry about being on the rifling with the AB. I have found they tend to shoot just fine with some jump. Your going to make most of us pull out our calculators to convert metric to standard, but the easiest way to start would be to load to the max of your magazine for good feeding and tweak it back from there. Find a solid powder charge and see what shoots. I am betting you'll find something pretty easily.
 
Rami270,

Load your cartridge to fit the magazine and adjust the powder charge for accuracy. Many rifles restrict the COAL by the magazine. These rifles can still be made to shoot very accurately through adjusting the powder charge. Welcome to the forum. Many of the fellows here will be able to help you along.
 
Dear Gentlemen
I appreciated of your notice and sorry to bother you I use metric.
To be truth , considering your all perfect experiences of loading and loading on and on , here it is very poor and as new comer to reloading , I try to dig my own way to follow usa standards and guidelines.
Sierra was great and now some of guys here used lots of Partition lots and ballistic Tips and rare to E-tip or AccuBond.

I 'll try to follow my max. Magazine length to reload the AB 130's in my rifle. it is my first time to reload Nosler bullets.
thanking you all
Rami
 
I used metric at work for 20 years. Welcome aboard and don't worry about using millimeters we can convert.
 
Hi there all :
I 'm wondering about the max. and min. jump of bullet in chamber !
I want to tweak it back around 3.287'' .
Thanks
Rami
 
Oldtrader3":15mbtyts said:
Game animals are 85% water inside. That is about the only relevence of shooting jugs. Some take jugs and wrap them with pork ribs to simulate shooting medium game.

I can't imagine that. Pork ribs are better suited on the grill!
IMG_0354.jpg


JD338
 
Oh, my, how good those pork ribs look, Jim. I'm with you; I can't imagine someone shooting those ribs just to test a bullet. I'd rather eat the ribs. :grin:
 
ROVERT":1thcb2b8 said:
Dan, Scotty is all over it. I am using RL-22. I worked up to 61 grains for my rifle...

Since that's a full 3 grains over max load in the Nosler #6, I'd certainly be cautious of high pressures in that load. It would be interesting to see what quickload shows for that powder charge. I'm not bashing your load, just making it clear to others reading this thread that both your powder charge and velocity are not the normal for the 270 Winchester.
 
Mountain Goat":2bjxaign said:
ROVERT":2bjxaign said:
Dan, Scotty is all over it. I am using RL-22. I worked up to 61 grains for my rifle...

Since that's a full 3 grains over max load in the Nosler #6, I'd certainly be cautious of high pressures in that load. It would be interesting to see what quickload shows for that powder charge. I'm not bashing your load, just making it clear to others reading this thread that both your powder charge and velocity are not the normal for the 270 Winchester.

MG, here is what 61 grains of RL22 looks like. While it is in the 60K+ range, I wouldn't be scared of it, working up to it of course..


Cartridge : .270 Win. (SAAMI)
Bullet : .277, 130, Nosler AccuBond 54987
Useable Case Capaci: 60.384 grain H2O = 3.921 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Alliant Reloder-22

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-10.0 98 54.90 2847 2340 43046 11262 93.4 1.280
-09.0 99 55.51 2882 2398 44604 11406 94.0 1.260
-08.0 100 56.12 2917 2456 46223 11546 94.6 1.239
-07.0 101 56.73 2952 2516 47907 11682 95.1 1.218
-06.0 102 57.34 2987 2576 49660 11813 95.6 1.198
-05.0 103 57.95 3023 2637 51484 11939 96.1 1.178
-04.0 104 58.56 3058 2699 53384 12060 96.6 1.159
-03.0 105 59.17 3093 2761 55362 12175 97.0 1.140 ! Near Maximum !
-02.0 106 59.78 3128 2825 57422 12285 97.4 1.121 ! Near Maximum !
-01.0 107 60.39 3163 2889 59571 12390 97.8 1.103 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 108 61.00 3199 2953 61811 12488 98.2 1.085 ! Near Maximum !
+01.0 109 61.61 3234 3019 64150 12580 98.5 1.067 ! Near Maximum !
+02.0 111 62.22 3269 3085 66586 12666 98.8 1.049 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0 112 62.83 3304 3152 69134 12745 99.0 1.032 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 113 63.44 3340 3219 71792 12817 99.3 1.015 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0 114 64.05 3375 3288 74557 12883 99.5 0.999 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 108 61.00 3365 3268 75852 12210 100.0 0.997 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 108 61.00 2973 2552 49321 12011 91.3 1.198
 
JD338":17e5fld2 said:
Oldtrader3":17e5fld2 said:
Game animals are 85% water inside. That is about the only relevence of shooting jugs. Some take jugs and wrap them with pork ribs to simulate shooting medium game.

I can't imagine that. Pork ribs are better suited on the grill!
IMG_0354.jpg


JD338

Man, you need me to send me that recipe again Jim! I really need that hook up!
 
Hi there all:
Is it wise to make CAOL around 85.00 or 86.00mm I mean single shooting with this length and more than SAAMI Std 84.84mm for 270win. .
I try to do it with AB130 and I am in doubt!.
Thanking You
Rami
 
rami270":3bkcorr3 said:
Hi there all:
Is it wise to make CAOL around 85.00 or 86.00mm I mean single shooting with this length and more than SAAMI Std 84.84mm for 270win. .
I try to do it with AB130 and I am in doubt!.
Thanking You
Rami
Are you talking about mm's? The COAL is 3.340 inches according to Nosler #6.
 
CatskillCrawler":30e1kjc3 said:
Your OAL is 3.346-3.386" which is a suitable length for the 270Win cartridge if it fits in your chamber.

Yes, but if considering magazine length as it is Mauser m98 action , it must be below 3.314.
The magazine doesn't allow more than this size!.

in single shooting it is ok but in hunting situation hmmmm, I must tweak back acc. to magazine.
Regards
Rami
 
Back
Top