6.5 140 Solid Base weight variances

[rjm158]

I didn't want to hijack JD's thread on the 308s so I started this one. I loaded some 6.5 Creedmoors using the seconds I got from SPS. As with the 308s, I weighed a handful and found one that was under weight at 139.9 and the rest were over weight at 140. 5, .6, and .7.

These are seconds so I don't expect them to be perfect. As long as they will shoot accurately, I have no concerns about their performance on deer. I'm hoping to get to the range tomorrow and see how they do.

Ron

 

[SJB358]

Looking forward to seeing how they shoot. They seem like great soft point bullets for the money.

 

[bkordon]

I just received three bags of 6.5 140s and have not checked weights yet. Cosmetically they seem to look good and cannot wait to load them for antelope and deer. I will weight sort them merely to see the variance. I’m excited to run some 140s in my 6.5x284. 125 partitions have been a hammer but are hard to come by. I won’t take shots over 500 yds partly because the wind always blows in the high desert of WY. If 140s will cut the wind a little better then it’s a bonus.

 

[rjm158]

I made a range trip yesterday with family to get rifles ready for our deer season that opens this Saturday. I have to say I was disappointed in both the 308 and 6.5 Solid Base accuracy. Both shot in the 1.5-1.75 realm, and this was from proven rifles. The ballistic numbers were good so I can only speculate the weight disparity might have contributed. They would have sufficed if there were no other options, and you kept distances to 100-125 yds.

Ron

 

[bkordon]

Well that is perplexing. I am a ways out from testing anything. I will get the lot weighed this weekend and see where my variance is. Thanks for the update and sorry the results were not better.