.300winmag
Handloader
- Oct 17, 2011
- 660
- 1
So on new years eve, I took my new toy over to my folks house with the fiancé for some family bonding. The usual occurred, my fiancé, mother and sister gathered to talk about what is important to them, and my father and I started weighing cases, bullets and then measuring bullets with an ogive comparator for the next days range session to chronograph the loads out of my 6mm BR Norma. When all was said and done, brass had been sorted so that we had 10 identical weighing cases, 14 identical bullets in both weight and ogive measurements (there was a lot of time to kill before the ball dropped :mrgreen: ). We loaded them up with 30.0 grains of Varget, seated the 105 grain Berger Hybrid's 0.015" off the rifling. The results from my 8 year old Chrony chronograph were less than stellar. I've included a picture below. Shot 4 and 7 did not register. I excluded the first shot as an outlier and averaging the remaining shots yields an average velocity of 2,967 FPS. Based on my research and .257 Ackley's posts (which are more than useful), I take this number as hogs wash! I also would like to believe my extreme spread is not that large.
I had my ballistics calculator with me and decided to try a different approach to coming up with a decent ballistic solution for the competition coming up. I ranged a rock with the Leica at 613 yards, about the size of a softball, based on my educated guess through the Swarovski.Using Berger's advertised G7 BC along with the atmospherics from my Kestral and a MV of 2,925 fps. My father touched off the shot and the rock disappeared. I then found a rock at 584 yards, same size with the same results after plugging the yardage into the ballistic computer. After that, we focussed on a 14" gong my father and I had set at 1,078 yards according to the leica. We plugged in the info (including spin drift, excluding Coriolis) and fired. Dead nutz center. I was very pleased...While the chronograph may have not provided the proper information, I feel confident iny being able to ring the max point target at the next shoot (800 yards 16" diameter) with the first shot. Still no groups to show at extended ranges... Looking forward to stretching it out on paper however.
I had my ballistics calculator with me and decided to try a different approach to coming up with a decent ballistic solution for the competition coming up. I ranged a rock with the Leica at 613 yards, about the size of a softball, based on my educated guess through the Swarovski.Using Berger's advertised G7 BC along with the atmospherics from my Kestral and a MV of 2,925 fps. My father touched off the shot and the rock disappeared. I then found a rock at 584 yards, same size with the same results after plugging the yardage into the ballistic computer. After that, we focussed on a 14" gong my father and I had set at 1,078 yards according to the leica. We plugged in the info (including spin drift, excluding Coriolis) and fired. Dead nutz center. I was very pleased...While the chronograph may have not provided the proper information, I feel confident iny being able to ring the max point target at the next shoot (800 yards 16" diameter) with the first shot. Still no groups to show at extended ranges... Looking forward to stretching it out on paper however.