tddeangelo
Handloader
- May 18, 2011
- 2,023
- 20
Is the receiver different on the pre-64's that modern production mounts would not fit a pre-'64?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
tddeangelo":1da39ey0 said:Is the receiver different on the pre-64's that modern production mounts would not fit a pre-'64?
SJB358":1yyw3wh8 said:Just looked and they do look different. Not sure what is different about them though? Hopefully Pat or someone on here with a Pre-64 can fill us in.
Did you get it? Still haven't got the number in my PM's? :shock:
Oldtrader3":27xj7agn said:The .425 rear mount spacing was used for some Pre 64 Magnum, actioned rifles and some "3-hole tapped actions" were also made using this rear mount screw spacing. These short rear spacing mounts holes are only on Pre-War and Transition Model rifles, according to Rule's book. No rifle's stamped over serial number 125,000 (1950) would have short space screws unless a gunsmith did it.
Oldtrader3":19wu3iql said:Tom, I am pretty sure that will be an acquisition that you will become very fond of, especially once you have owned one and taken a few head of game with it. I have owned three of them, two were 1950's vintage Alaskan, Model 70's and one was from a short run that USRAC ran in the late 1980's. I always liked the Alaskan version because they had a red "Winchester" recoil pad on them from the factory.
I am sure that these will not get any cheaper in the future. Good luck with finding what you want while you can still find one. I would look for one somewhere near the low 300,XXX serial number range, if you can find one.
Charlie
tddeangelo":2jbuiiwp said:Charlie,
The deal here is that a friend of my father's and also of mine is in charge of selling the firearms and related contents from the estate of a gunsmith who passed away somewhat recently. Another mutual friend was discussing the contents of said estate with the gent in charge of liquidating it. As they were talking, Friend #2 recalled talking with me on a hunt about rifles we'd like to some day own, and that I'd said I'd really like to someday get a pre-'64 in 300H&H.
So Friend #2 asks if such a rifle is in the estate, and it turns out there is indeed a pre-'64 300 H&H in the mix of stuff.
At this time, I'm waiting until the friend in charge of the liquidation is able to get through the higher dollar stuff and he will then call me. He has told me it is not going anywhere before I get a chance to check it out. I've pretty much decided that if the price is anywhere close to reasonable, I will purchase it.
DrMike":1wct09p5 said:Well, we could throw friend #4 into the mix. He is a true "Winchesterophile" and certified gun crank. He would be able to make an absolutely dependable assessment after only one season of using said firearm in pursuit of appropriate game, and then permit friend No. 3 to examine said firearm in the presence of friend #4, just to assure everyone involved that said firearm is indeed all it is purported to be. :mrgreen: Works for me.
DrMike":27w7egmq said:Well, we could throw friend #4 into the mix. He is a true "Winchesterophile" and certified gun crank. He would be able to make an absolutely dependable assessment after only one season of using said firearm in pursuit of appropriate game, and then permit friend No. 3 to examine said firearm in the presence of friend #4, just to assure everyone involved that said firearm is indeed all it is purported to be. :mrgreen: Works for me.
DrMike":3eqvyd3p said:Tom, your idea will never work. Take it from me. I only have your best interest at heart.