bullet
Handloader
- Dec 26, 2007
- 4,973
- 8
Songdog":2qgs8lx7 said:bullet":2qgs8lx7 said:I guess if I had only one method of hunting like you, or 30 square miles in all directions that I could see, I would specialize my equipment and change my method of zeroing. But I hunt to many different environments, so I have a general approach that serves me fairly well in all the different places I go. In fact, in the morning I will be in a thicket with a max shot of 35yds and will be using my 358Win, while hunting over a couple of deer scrapes and also will be on the look out for a hog.
That's exactly my point... if there was ever a place where you'd think that equipment needed to be 'specialized'... it would be out here. Yet, over the past 20 years... every time I screw-around with a zero that puts my point of impact further than 2" above my POA... stuff gets missed that should have been a slam dunk (150-200 yards). I reckon it doesn't matter a whole lot though... if you're hunting stuff with a vital zone the size of a basketball...
I have never had that problem, because I hold center of the mass of my target. I don't hold low or high until past 340yds then only out to 440yds. Now I have not missed coyote or bobcat that are 100-250yds because I will only hold center of the mass of what my target gives me and I don't have any problems, but that might be because I have done it this was for 30years or so. I don't have to guess on a quick shot and if hunting a big field I range my distances and know when I am past the range where I hold center of mass which is all the way out to 340 yds. Sure has allowed me to take a lot of game that was crossing a short area and I didn't have much time to take my shot.