Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
RiverMan":r2w8pb4b said:The load data is showing 2850 with a 265 at 79grs. Of RL22. But then shows 74 as a max of RL22 with a 250gr. The books just not making a ton of sense to me. Hopefully someone from nosler will chime in here.
I was using the Lapua as a baseline since that’s what all the claims are based on. I’m simply looking for some real world info not just book stuff. I’m not claiming any to be better than the other. Just want some info.diverdown":2n8o9hll said:I noticed that the .338RUM hasn't been mentioned and that's interesting as it's right at the upper end of all the cartridges mentioned with velocity and energy. Actually, It's closer if not the same as the Lapua than the others.
thatguySHM":1rxj06kb said:What will you be hunting with the rifle? Weight goal? Distances you plan on hunting?
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
thatguySHM":3nlsnd9a said:I use both the 338 Federal and 338-06 and love them both. I prefer speed with premium bullets, using a 180gr AccuBond in the Federal and currently testing the 200gr NBT in the 06. I have loads with the 225 AccuBond in the 338-06 but after weighing a jacket I found from the 200 BTs I like something that sheds a bit more weight, with the jacket weighing about 98 grains.
With the AI vs plain Jane debate, I don't buy it but plenty of people think they are the cats butt. They definitely have their place, but I read in a Handloader magazine a few years ago that the case capacity difference is around 3%, so if you want to stay within sane pressure limits, you can expect to safely put in 3% more powder. To each their own though, and I do plan on doing a 22-250 AI, although there is plenty of pressure tested data available for that cartridge.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk