DrMike
Ballistician
- Nov 8, 2006
- 37,502
- 6,507
Not much meat damage with that head shot! Great story and some good information. Thanks, 1Shot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
35 Whelen":2v1ln91j said:New Kimber rifle and Swarvoski Scope $3000
The 'best' way to lose a lot of meat is to lose the entire animal.
+1...LouSJB358":29xb1xnb said:Elkman":29xb1xnb said:Another advantage of the behind shoulder, midway up the body shot is that a modest ranges you really don't have to fuss over bullet placement. I have said that when I shoot an animal at a modest distance, I am not conscious of trigger pull, nor given some thought particularly fussy about placement. When everything looks right and in the right area the rifle goes off and 99% of the time my hunt is over. I know that may sound a bit odd but the more I think about it the more that I believe that is the case. Out past 300 yards I take a lot more time for bullet placement but this side of 300 its more of a "yup thats good" boom.! I have also been shooting the same rifle for 41 years.
I think I have been around old goats like the Bill's of the world and don't overly think about meat damage really. I take the shot I have and put my bullet on course to do the most damage I can. I know I sound a little backward, but if I have a shot of anything less than broadside, I try to imagine the bullet striking the far leg bone. That is my compass for bullet placement. If I have a long shot I will think more about the placement, but like Bill says, when you have a shot, you oughta take it quick, cause it probably won't be there for too long. Scotty