HAWKEYESATX
Handloader
- Aug 15, 2016
- 1,870
- 238
I have been wondering what the general consensus on here is about the lowly .308 Winchester?
I have noticed that in the general gun writers opinions the .308 is a capable cartridge, but it is outdone by the .30-06, and the .30 Magnums!
I’m the first one to realize that the .30-06 will add 100-150 fps to any bullet weight, with judicious hand loading.
Now, to defend the .308 a little, in factory guise, it is loaded more to potential and gets better velocities than factory loaded .30-06 ammo.
Also, the .308 is the second most reloaded cartridge, and is within the top 10 of cartridge sales, here in the States.
Yes, the .308 isn’t a barn burner, or flashy. It never has been. It’s been a plain Jane performer, but does its job extremely well.
I just got done reading an article by John Barsness and his thoughts on the .308!
John states: “One basic rule of ballistics is that the smaller the case for the bullet involved, the more energy is transferred to the bullet and less to the shooter’s shoulder. The .308 has just about 50 grains of powder space. The .300 Remington Ultra Magnum has about 100 grains. Does the .300 send 180-grain bullets out the muzzle at twice the speed of the .308? No, it only achieves about 25 percent more velocity. Much of the extra powder is released at the muzzle in the form of fast, loud gas, adding a lot to recoil.”
“Despite what’s written and shown on TV these days, 300 yards is a long shot for most hunters. What helps us more than anything is a rifle we can shoot accurately, not a few less inches of bullet drop. The .308 Winchester helps hunters more than most other big game cartridges not just because it recoils less than larger .30s, but because it is inherently accurate.” “I am a big fan of the .30-06 and right now own half a dozen. I also like the .300 magnums enough to own four in chamberings from .300 WSM to .300 Weatherby. I have used .300 magnums to take many big game animals both in North America and Africa ranging from 75-pound springbok to 800-pound elk. But the longer I see the .308 in action, the more it impresses me.” “One of the .308’s virtues is shared by other moderate-velocity cartridges such as the 7x57 Mauser: good performance even from relatively lightly constructed bullets.” “In recent years, I’ve become quite fond of cartridges that do the job out to the ranges most game is killed, without bouncing my glasses off my nose or bruising my shoulder. The 7x57 might have more romance, and the .30-06 may have another 100 fps. When neither seems that important, the .308 works great.”
I, for one, think these words ring a lot of truth.
I was wondering what the general consensus was with knowledgeable folks on here about the diminutive .30 is?
I have noticed that in the general gun writers opinions the .308 is a capable cartridge, but it is outdone by the .30-06, and the .30 Magnums!
I’m the first one to realize that the .30-06 will add 100-150 fps to any bullet weight, with judicious hand loading.
Now, to defend the .308 a little, in factory guise, it is loaded more to potential and gets better velocities than factory loaded .30-06 ammo.
Also, the .308 is the second most reloaded cartridge, and is within the top 10 of cartridge sales, here in the States.
Yes, the .308 isn’t a barn burner, or flashy. It never has been. It’s been a plain Jane performer, but does its job extremely well.
I just got done reading an article by John Barsness and his thoughts on the .308!
John states: “One basic rule of ballistics is that the smaller the case for the bullet involved, the more energy is transferred to the bullet and less to the shooter’s shoulder. The .308 has just about 50 grains of powder space. The .300 Remington Ultra Magnum has about 100 grains. Does the .300 send 180-grain bullets out the muzzle at twice the speed of the .308? No, it only achieves about 25 percent more velocity. Much of the extra powder is released at the muzzle in the form of fast, loud gas, adding a lot to recoil.”
“Despite what’s written and shown on TV these days, 300 yards is a long shot for most hunters. What helps us more than anything is a rifle we can shoot accurately, not a few less inches of bullet drop. The .308 Winchester helps hunters more than most other big game cartridges not just because it recoils less than larger .30s, but because it is inherently accurate.” “I am a big fan of the .30-06 and right now own half a dozen. I also like the .300 magnums enough to own four in chamberings from .300 WSM to .300 Weatherby. I have used .300 magnums to take many big game animals both in North America and Africa ranging from 75-pound springbok to 800-pound elk. But the longer I see the .308 in action, the more it impresses me.” “One of the .308’s virtues is shared by other moderate-velocity cartridges such as the 7x57 Mauser: good performance even from relatively lightly constructed bullets.” “In recent years, I’ve become quite fond of cartridges that do the job out to the ranges most game is killed, without bouncing my glasses off my nose or bruising my shoulder. The 7x57 might have more romance, and the .30-06 may have another 100 fps. When neither seems that important, the .308 works great.”
I, for one, think these words ring a lot of truth.
I was wondering what the general consensus was with knowledgeable folks on here about the diminutive .30 is?