- Nov 4, 2004
- 25,162
- 8,419
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That's a good one Hawk. I like them Winchesters also. With a good pad after rebore you'll be good to go. Be waiting to see how it works out for you. Dan.HAWKEYESATX":2wbnx3bo said:Hey there Dan!wvbuckbuster":2wbnx3bo said:Hey Hawk I read that you are selling the Rem 78 to get more barrel length but that rifle would be an ideal candidate for reboring to 35 Whelen. Solid action unless you just like the Mauser style. Just a thought. Dan.HAWKEYESATX":2wbnx3bo said:That’s what I was hoping for, to get the hydrostatic shot up past the 300 WM, and reduce recoil at the same time.preacher":2wbnx3bo said:Hey Hawkeye- If you can get a solid 2900 in the standard Whelan with the 200 TTSX, you can use it in place of any 300WM up to 375yds! It will also kill like the 338WM and the 200X (used them both in South Africa) I found the 200X I used on my last trip with my 35 WAI to be just as effective as the 250X was on my first trip! Surprisingly, while I never had any, ever, headspace issues with the standard Whelan shoulder, I "did" with new cases in both the 9.3x62 and .404 Jeffry. My point being "I believe" the 35 Whelan has plenty of shoulder to headspace on. You will be one very fortunate man nowadays IF you can shoot yours enough to wear out the cases in a batch of 100! FWIW I have never played with the 225gr anything , I always stayed on each end, 200- 250/310. Good luck to you Pard.
I just bought a Mauser 98 in 8mm Mauser, with a 25 inch barrel, and I’m selling my Remington 78 Sportsman in .30-06. I wanted a little longer barrel for my rebore, and am going to rebore/rechamber the Mauser into a 35 Whelen with 3 groove rifling, and a 1 in 10 inch twist. I’m taking Scottie’s advice on that one. I want to see what that twist will do.
I’m thinking it may make the lighter weights not as accurate as the heavier bullets.
Hawk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I found a new candidate to be rebored to 35 Whelen.
It’s a Winchester 670 in 30-06 with a 22 inch barrel. I had to get this because stock dimensions fit me perfectly. I’ll probably just need to add a decent recoil pad on it now.
Hawk
That's textbook mushrooming right there!JD338":etr9f4mp said:Here's a 250 gr PT that was recovered in the 7th water jug.
MV was 2450 fps. The 250 gr PT penetrates almost into tomorrow.
JD338
Hey Dan!wvbuckbuster":9vbhpdv5 said:That's a good one Hawk. I like them Winchesters also. With a good pad after rebore you'll be good to go. Be waiting to see how it works out for you. Dan.HAWKEYESATX":9vbhpdv5 said:Hey there Dan!wvbuckbuster":9vbhpdv5 said:Hey Hawk I read that you are selling the Rem 78 to get more barrel length but that rifle would be an ideal candidate for reboring to 35 Whelen. Solid action unless you just like the Mauser style. Just a thought. Dan.HAWKEYESATX":9vbhpdv5 said:That’s what I was hoping for, to get the hydrostatic shot up past the 300 WM, and reduce recoil at the same time.preacher said:Hey Hawkeye- If you can get a solid 2900 in the standard Whelan with the 200 TTSX, you can use it in place of any 300WM up to 375yds! It will also kill like the 338WM and the 200X (used them both in South Africa) I found the 200X I used on my last trip with my 35 WAI to be just as effective as the 250X was on my first trip! Surprisingly, while I never had any, ever, headspace issues with the standard Whelan shoulder, I "did" with new cases in both the 9.3x62 and .404 Jeffry. My point being "I believe" the 35 Whelan has plenty of shoulder to headspace on. You will be one very fortunate man nowadays IF you can shoot yours enough to wear out the cases in a batch of 100! FWIW I have never played with the 225gr anything , I always stayed on each end, 200- 250/310. Good luck to you Pard.
I just bought a Mauser 98 in 8mm Mauser, with a 25 inch barrel, and I’m selling my Remington 78 Sportsman in .30-06. I wanted a little longer barrel for my rebore, and am going to rebore/rechamber the Mauser into a 35 Whelen with 3 groove rifling, and a 1 in 10 inch twist. I’m taking Scottie’s advice on that one. I want to see what that twist will do.
I’m thinking it may make the lighter weights not as accurate as the heavier bullets.
Hawk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I found a new candidate to be rebored to 35 Whelen.
It’s a Winchester 670 in 30-06 with a 22 inch barrel. I had to get this because stock dimensions fit me perfectly. I’ll probably just need to add a decent recoil pad on it now.
Hawk
HAWKEYESATX":37vto2ky said:That's textbook mushrooming right there!JD338":37vto2ky said:Here's a 250 gr PT that was recovered in the 7th water jug.
MV was 2450 fps. The 250 gr PT penetrates almost into tomorrow.
JD338
Holy Cow! 7 water JUGS?!?
Did you get a shower you didn't expect after firing that round? LOL
Hawk
Sent from my REVVLRY+ using Tapatalk
I don’t have any doubt that that load hits the steel gong with authority at 250 yds.JD338":aubwkeam said:HAWKEYESATX":aubwkeam said:That's textbook mushrooming right there!JD338":aubwkeam said:Here's a 250 gr PT that was recovered in the 7th water jug.
MV was 2450 fps. The 250 gr PT penetrates almost into tomorrow.
JD338
Holy Cow! 7 water JUGS?!?
Did you get a shower you didn't expect after firing that round? LOL
Hawk
Sent from my REVVLRY+ using Tapatalk
Hawk,
That was about 10 years ago. As I recall, I was about 50 yards away from the jugs. I shot one into the jugs last fall in preparation for a bear hunt. This one was launched at 2580 fps. It was the same performance. I'll post a picture of that bullet which looks the same except it lost the front core. It's a tough bullet. I used it last year on a nice WT buck broadside at 50 yards. The PT went through both shoulders and dropped him dead where he stood.
It's a great bullet. BTW, it hits my 250 yard gong hard. I wouldn't hesitate to shoot an elk with that load at 400 yards.
Maybe brinky72 will chim I and tell you about our 35 Whelen's power.
JD338
You can tell that deer expired immediately!JD338":2yi8cubh said:Here is last year's buck taken with the 35 Whelen and a 250 gr PT.
JD338
HAWKEYESATX":37omf98v said:I don’t have any doubt that that load hits the steel gong with authority at 250 yds.JD338":37omf98v said:HAWKEYESATX":37omf98v said:That's textbook mushrooming right there!JD338":37omf98v said:Here's a 250 gr PT that was recovered in the 7th water jug.
MV was 2450 fps. The 250 gr PT penetrates almost into tomorrow.
JD338
Holy Cow! 7 water JUGS?!?
Did you get a shower you didn't expect after firing that round? LOL
Hawk
Sent from my REVVLRY+ using Tapatalk
Hawk,
That was about 10 years ago. As I recall, I was about 50 yards away from the jugs. I shot one into the jugs last fall in preparation for a bear hunt. This one was launched at 2580 fps. It was the same performance. I'll post a picture of that bullet which looks the same except it lost the front core. It's a tough bullet. I used it last year on a nice WT buck broadside at 50 yards. The PT went through both shoulders and dropped him dead where he stood.
It's a great bullet. BTW, it hits my 250 yard gong hard. I wouldn't hesitate to shoot an elk with that load at 400 yards.
Maybe brinky72 will chim I and tell you about our 35 Whelen's power.
JD338
While the 35 Whelen isn’t a long range round, it can reach out and touch big animals with a lot of energy out to 450 - 500 yds from what I’ve been reading.
It takes a lot to stop the 250 gr bullet, even at regular hunting distances.
I sure do love the Nosler Partitions in any caliber. They have worked for decades.
With you getting 2580 fps, that’s a lot of steam behind that 250 gr bullet.
I love to read of the instances of where deer were bowled over, and the true claims of DRT. That’s exactly what I want right there! Although I have decent tracking skills, my body isn’t as willing anymore to do such a thing, so being able to have a cartridge/rifle combo like that is top on my list!
I would definitely like to hear @brinky72’s accounts as well.
The more the merrier I say!
Hawk
@brinky72Brinky72":3j5f72u9 said:Hawk; I finally found my way here after JD bumped me. I built my Whelen on a Ruger 77/Hawkeye SS action, Shilen 24” SS 1:14” barrel and a average Hogue pillar bedded stock. I put a wiggatinney (? Spelling) rail with an old school Leupold 3X9X40 scope from 1980 something. It’s about 8# and my hand loads with RL15 sends a 250 Speer down range at an average velocity of 2675-ish FPS. I too beat myself up with the standard v AI or 338-06 question. To say I’m happy with what I have is a gross understatement.
I haven’t used a 35AI, 338-06 or others mentioned so I can only speak for the standard Whelen. I just had it for a year now and have killed two deer and a black bear with it last season. Compared to other rifles I’ve used it kills and flattens deer and bear as good and better than anything I’ve owned. That list includes several 300 mags, a 450 Marlin and a stoutly loaded 45-70 Ruger No.1. I’ve had little issues with loading ammo as far as headspace issues. My only issues were growing pains that come with a tight chamber and throat as I opted for a match chamber to get the best accuracy out of it. That’s a whole other conversation. With prudent loading, a good 250 gr bullet and a little practice you’ll likely find your other rifles collecting dust. I have 250 grain Speer bullets, 59.5 grains of RL15 and standard rifle primers as my go to. This gives me about 2673FPS actual Chrono’d velocity. This is well above what book loads are but safe and well within safe pressure limits for MY RIFLE. many run up to 61 grains of 15 without issues. Again your rifle is its own entity so be safe. Again, I’m left not wanting when it comes to the standard Whelen in my rifle.
Holy Cow!!!Brinky72":2wl5c53a said:HAWKEYESATX":2wl5c53a said:I don’t have any doubt that that load hits the steel gong with authority at 250 yds.JD338":2wl5c53a said:HAWKEYESATX":2wl5c53a said:That's textbook mushrooming right there!JD338 said:Here's a 250 gr PT that was recovered in the 7th water jug.
MV was 2450 fps. The 250 gr PT penetrates almost into tomorrow.
JD338
Holy Cow! 7 water JUGS?!?
Did you get a shower you didn't expect after firing that round? LOL
Hawk
Sent from my REVVLRY+ using Tapatalk
Hawk,
That was about 10 years ago. As I recall, I was about 50 yards away from the jugs. I shot one into the jugs last fall in preparation for a bear hunt. This one was launched at 2580 fps. It was the same performance. I'll post a picture of that bullet which looks the same except it lost the front core. It's a tough bullet. I used it last year on a nice WT buck broadside at 50 yards. The PT went through both shoulders and dropped him dead where he stood.
It's a great bullet. BTW, it hits my 250 yard gong hard. I wouldn't hesitate to shoot an elk with that load at 400 yards.
Maybe brinky72 will chim I and tell you about our 35 Whelen's power.
JD338
While the 35 Whelen isn’t a long range round, it can reach out and touch big animals with a lot of energy out to 450 - 500 yds from what I’ve been reading.
It takes a lot to stop the 250 gr bullet, even at regular hunting distances.
I sure do love the Nosler Partitions in any caliber. They have worked for decades.
With you getting 2580 fps, that’s a lot of steam behind that 250 gr bullet.
I love to read of the instances of where deer were bowled over, and the true claims of DRT. That’s exactly what I want right there! Although I have decent tracking skills, my body isn’t as willing anymore to do such a thing, so being able to have a cartridge/rifle combo like that is top on my list!
I would definitely like to hear @brinky72’s accounts as well.
The more the merrier I say!
Hawk
To add for details. The first deer I shot rolled over at impact and pretty much stayed put. Deer #2 fell immediately and some how “snow plowed” a short distance. Both hit in the engine room just behind the shoulder. The bear was treed over hounds and was about 12-15 feet up in a hemlock. I drilled it in the center of the ribs and the exit was right in between the shoulder blades. It came out of the tree backwards and hit the ground dead breaking its right femur. The guys backing me up were thoroughly impressed and hadn’t seen a bear drop like that before. Usual guns are 12 gauge slug guns, 06’, 270, 308 class. It made a good impression.
KinleyWater":1u1oo6y4 said:I've shot a mix of factory and handloads through my Whelen. I found that in the 700 Classic, the recoil with Superformance loads was enough to pinch nerves in my shoulder, causing fingers in my shooting hand to go numb. That's not like anything I've had happen with any other rifle I own, though the largest bore is a 375 Ruger. I also found that even in the 22 inch barrel, my particular rifle averaged only 10fps below advertised with the Hornady load. Remington 200 and 250 grain loads were smooth. All shot accurately.
For handloads, I shoot a lot of Speer, because of the cost, and well, they work. 180's and 250's seem to do very well for accuracy and expansion, even at moderate velocities. I've loaded the 250 grain Partition for it as well and found it accurate, but no experience with expansion - though I've no reason to doubt the performance. Also shot quite a few Hornady FTX, which I believe are designed for the 35 Rem. They're accurate enough for me, and I can push them at modest velocities still well above 35 Rem and below 35 Whelen max.
Lots of flexibility.
Oh no!Thebear_78":32tdgh49 said:If your wanting 358 Norma performance you should start with the 358 Norma. Why push the whelen. I fear building this rifle with 250s @ 2700fps expectations is setting yourself up for disappointment
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t doubt that!Brinky72":1umkwj75 said:KinleyWater":1umkwj75 said:I've shot a mix of factory and handloads through my Whelen. I found that in the 700 Classic, the recoil with Superformance loads was enough to pinch nerves in my shoulder, causing fingers in my shooting hand to go numb. That's not like anything I've had happen with any other rifle I own, though the largest bore is a 375 Ruger. I also found that even in the 22 inch barrel, my particular rifle averaged only 10fps below advertised with the Hornady load. Remington 200 and 250 grain loads were smooth. All shot accurately.
For handloads, I shoot a lot of Speer, because of the cost, and well, they work. 180's and 250's seem to do very well for accuracy and expansion, even at moderate velocities. I've loaded the 250 grain Partition for it as well and found it accurate, but no experience with expansion - though I've no reason to doubt the performance. Also shot quite a few Hornady FTX, which I believe are designed for the 35 Rem. They're accurate enough for me, and I can push them at modest velocities still well above 35 Rem and below 35 Whelen max.
Lots of flexibility.
You need a new/different recoil pad. JD338 has a 700 classic with the “red brick” recoil pad and my Whelen has much less felt recoil. I have a Hogue over molded stock on mine. Nothing too fancy but it kicks much less than a 700 classic.
Well noted!Thebear_78":b4ct2dvm said:I wouldn’t get too hung up on velocity. Have your rifle built, work up a load for accuracy, as long as it’s in the wheelhouse of expected velocity performance will be just fine. 2400-2550 there will be no practical performance difference.
I just know every time I’ve built a rifle planning a n a certain performance or even around a specific bullet it rarely goes according to plan
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk