A Day With the 35s

DrMike

Ballistician
Nov 8, 2006
37,317
5,989
Over the past several days I've spent a fair amount of time at the range in preparation for hunting this fall. I have three 35 calibre rifles that are unblooded--a 358 Winchester, a 35 Whelen and a 350 Remington Magnum. This is some of the work I've been doing with these rifles to get them ready to take with me beginning this weekend.

The 358 has always shot well, so it was not a great concern. I have tried a variety of loads. Time is getting short, so I'm focused on what is working. Three loads in particular have shot very well in this rifle: 200 grain Hornady FTX with 47 grains of IMR 3031 (2495 fps and 1 inch groups, 200 grain Barnes TSX with 49 grains of H335 (2451 fps, 0.66 inch), and 200 grain Barnes TSX with 47 grains of IMR 3031 (2400 fps, 0.57 inch). It is this latter load that I'll carry with me afield when I carry this Hawkeye this fall.

Here is a picture of the rifle, and of the group produced with it.

P8130148.jpg



P8130142.jpg



I've worked with my Hawkeye chambered in 35 Whelen and continue to return to what has worked consistently. I worked up a load with Speer 250 grain Grand Slam which gave me a MOA group, but the velocity was somewhat low (2288 fps). Nosler 250 grain Partition with a stiff charge of A2520 gave me 1.15 inch groups at 2570 fps. This load merits consideration. I will return to it throughout the season to work with it. I do believe it would be a hammer on game. I tested and rejected RL17 with Swift 225 grain A-Frames, even though they gave me adequate velocity and accuracy. I also tested and rejected due to poor accuracy, 225 grain Swift A-Frames with Big Game and Nosler 225 grain AB with IMR 3031. The same was true with Nosler 225 grain PT and A2495. Sierra 225 grain SBT with A2520 yielded reasonable groups and the velocities are good, and I'll likely review this data again at a later time. At the lowest charge, I shot a 0.58 inch group, but the groups opened up at the charge increased. I also worked up loads built around Speer 250 grain Grand Slams and IMR 4895, as well as Swift 250 grain A-Frames with RL15. Each shows some promise, but there are better loads.

The time is here when I have to settle on a hunting load, however. Ergo, I've returned to what works: 56 grains of A2520 behind a Barnes 225 grain TSX at 2600 fps yielding 0.5 to 1.0 inch groups. Here was one group shot this afternoon.

P8130139.jpg


Here is a picture of the rifle. I've grown fond of it as I have spent so much time with it at the bench.

P8130151.jpg



I've groused about the 350 Remington Magnum since I bought it. It never shot quite like I thought it should. Well, that is changing. I'm not certain what happened, but the rifle has potential. One of the groups that is very promising is built around the Nosler 225 grain Partition and RL15. Across the spectrum, each charge yielded a MOA group. I did note that every group has two shots touching and one out. However, there is no consistency. The one out may be the first, the second or the third. It is just interesting, but I'm unwilling to draw any conclusions at this time.

P8110135.jpg


Hornady 250 grain SP with a good charge of H4895 yields MOA and 2436 fps. Likewise, a Barnes 225 grain TSX with 61 grains of TAC gives me a velocity of 2710 fps and a group size of 0.45 inches. Obviously, this will receive some attention. I worked with the Nosler 225 grain Partition and charges of Big Game and RL17. As the charge increased with RL17, the groups opened up. Velocity was nothing to write home about, but it was adequate. With Big Game, the groups were pretty consistent at MOA, but the velocity was 2400 or less across the spectrum. I'll play with this, increasing the charge to test it again. I also tested the 200 grain TSX with Big Game, but I've rejected this load as it was inferior in both accuracy and velocity. However, when I used IMR 4895 with the 200 grain TSX, the stiffer the charge, the better the accuracy, until the maximum charge when this was the group produced.

P8130145.jpg


I shot the first two rounds and wanted to quit as they were centred on each other. However, being the responsible individual that I am, I pulled the trigger on the third round, and it was only slightly out. There is still one jagged hold of 0.24 inches. The velocity is very good at 2680 fps. Then, I pulled out some of the hunting loads I had made up last fall to test them. They produced a 0.70 inch group at 2765 fps. This is a 200 grain TSX with 59 grains of TAC. It will likely be the load I carry with me on opening day for moose (Sunday morning).

P8130138.jpg



Oh, yeah, I think I'll keep this ugly Remington for a little longer. It has redeemed itself and become beautiful in my eyes.

P8130147.jpg
 
Mike,

You just got to love the 35's. Accurate and powerful!
Nice shooting.

JD338
 
Jim,

I'm loaded for bear. I'll be taking a couple of loads to the range tomorrow just for grins and giggles. Then, Sunday morning at 4 a.m., I'll be sitting on a hillside glassing a beautiful little valley with a gurgling stream meandering through it. It has always produced far more moose than should be there.
 
Where is the old .35 Rem? :grin: Good shooting, looks like you have some great loads there.
 
You know, I don't own a 35 Remington. There is a deficit in my gun safe. Does it help if I tell you that I have two .356s and another .358 chambered in a BLR?
 
You've got to love those TSX. Excellent shooting there DrMike. 350 Remington magnum? I only read about it in the magazine and reloading manuals :) .
 
Two young farmers were at the range today. Moose opens in two days, and they had their "farm rifles" getting ready for the season. One asked me what I was shooting. When I told him I was shooting a 35 Whelen, a 350 Remington Magnum and a 358, he responded, "Oh, you're shooting exotics. I never heard of any of those." That's me, exotic Mike.
 
Nice shooting Mike. I know you have been working pretty hard on the 35's in your safe. Those are some great shooters. It looks like you are well represented. I like your 673. Even though it isn't a pretty rifle at all, it looks like a solidly built bolt gun, that is easy to carry. It seems like the TSX's are really winning in your 35's. Scotty
 
DrMike":3mbge5wj said:
Does it help if I tell you that I have two .356s and another .358 chambered in a BLR?

Doc,

Can you give me your impressions of the BLR? I was looking at picking one up, but haven't quite made up my mind about it.

Also, have you tried RL15 in your Whelens?
 
BK, I have a BLR 358 Win also and man, it is a great carrying rifle, and seems to shoot pretty well. The rifle itself is very strong. The only dislike about it is the trigger. It is heavy and requires some time at the range to break it in. Once you master the trigger, it will turn in some excellent groups. I haven't really did a ton of load work for mine yet, but with about everything I have thrown at it, it shot around 1 to 1.5" at 100. Plus, it is a nice carrying rifle that feels good in the hands. Scotty
 
Thanks, Scotty. I've been looking at the takedown version, and thinking about a Leupold Scout Scope on it.... seems like that would be a great dark timber elk crusher.
 
That has always been the plan for my 358, it shoots plenty flat to 300 yards, so I figured it would be a good deer/elk thumper for carrying. I started out loading 225's when I first got it and shot two deer, one with the 220gr Speer and one with a 225gr Sierra. Neither bullet slowed down in deer! Right now I am going to try out 225gr Sierras and 225gr Nosler PT's again. Hopefully, with one of those two, I get a good 2400FPS load that will be the 358's last load work up. Scotty


DSC_0164.jpg
 
BK,

The BLR is a sweet rifle that gives me several loads that group around 0.6 to 1.0 inches. I've only used this rifle on bison, but it worked reasonably well. It did put the animal down. However, I was shooting a 250 grain bullet at modest velocity. Next time, I'll use a 225 with higher velocities.

I really like the BLR. Here's a picture of that rifle, together with several Model 94s (one .375 and two .356) that grace my safe.

P7150114.jpg



The BLR wears a Zeiss 1.8 - 5.5 scope, which works very well on it. The rifle carries well and shoots straight. What's not to like?
 
Nice shooting Mike but you also have some great looking rifles!!! I am partial to the two Ruger rifles but it looks like all three will work. :grin:
 
Scott,

The Rugers are a joy to handle. The 358, especially, brings a smile to my face. It is surprisingly accurate with a variety of loads. I had intended to divest myself of the 673 and pick up a Remington CDL that is on the store shelf right now. However, it is difficult to part with something before it is blooded. I let a Classic chambered in 35 Whelen get away, and I don't want to let that happen again.
 
DrMike":3n4ct4os said:
BK,

The BLR is a sweet rifle that gives me several loads that group around 0.6 to 1.0 inches. I've only used this rifle on bison, but it worked reasonably well. It did put the animal down. However, I was shooting a 250 grain bullet at modest velocity. Next time, I'll use a 225 with higher velocities.

I really like the BLR. Here's a picture of that rifle, together with several Model 94s (one .375 and two .356) that grace my safe.

P7150114.jpg



The BLR wears a Zeiss 1.8 - 5.5 scope, which works very well on it. The rifle carries well and shoots straight. What's not to like?

Wow, Doc, that is the first time I've ever seen Euroglass on a Model 94!
 
Hard to beat the accuracy of the TSX! I've never shot a rifle that didn't love them. Nice shooting!
 
BK,

Two Zeiss (a Diavari and a Conquest) and a Kahles top my lever guns. They are actually comfortable, and they do extend the range significantly for my aged eyes. I had a 2 X 8 Leupold Vari-X 3 and a 2 X 7 B & L Model 3200 at other times. I sold the B & L, but it was a great scope. I transferred the Leupold to a 260 Remington for my grandchildren.
 
That's some nice glass you have there. I just can't bring myself to scope an M94. Of course, I can't hit for crap with irons on a rifle, so I guess I'm just dumb for holding on to my prejudices.
 
Back
Top