occasionally a new bullet will be introduced in an uncommon weight. Of course reloaders always need an excuse to buy a new manual, but this is not always practical. And the new data may not be the best anyway....
for example: the 110 grain Nosler AccuBond in .257
It is safe to use the 115 grain BT data, but I like to get as much as I possibly can out of a cartridge.
In my opinion, the bearing surface of a bullet has alot to do with pressures, as well as weight. So my question to you all is this:
Which is more crucial in effecting pressure? weight or bearing surface?
also, if someone happens to own the following three bullets:
100 grain BT
110 grain AB
115 grain BT
could you please measure the bearing surface for us to get an idea of which BT is most like the AB. Obviously the 115 is closer in weight, but the different internals may just put that 110AB a closer relative to the 100BT???????
for example: the 110 grain Nosler AccuBond in .257
It is safe to use the 115 grain BT data, but I like to get as much as I possibly can out of a cartridge.
In my opinion, the bearing surface of a bullet has alot to do with pressures, as well as weight. So my question to you all is this:
Which is more crucial in effecting pressure? weight or bearing surface?
also, if someone happens to own the following three bullets:
100 grain BT
110 grain AB
115 grain BT
could you please measure the bearing surface for us to get an idea of which BT is most like the AB. Obviously the 115 is closer in weight, but the different internals may just put that 110AB a closer relative to the 100BT???????