Ist Post- My One Hunting Rifle Answer For All, I know!

wildcatter

Beginner
Jan 11, 2025
6
19
Well let me say, I've said many times, No Such Gun. But things change at 70 years of age. Mainly how and where I'm able to hunt. So after owning 100's of different hunting and target rifles, handguns, and many different caliber, handloading them all, I'm going to build my last Big Game Rifle! Anything from antelope, to Elk, maybe Moose. Moose or grizz are likely to never happen, but Mule Deer, and Elk are highly likely. Plus I will only kill what a boots on the ground, self guided hunt, considering my physical abilities, my choice has been decided and is underway!

I have decided on a 338-06 AI. I have the dies, some bullets, most powders, Lapua brass, and a #4 contour Brux 1-10 barrel in hand. The rifle will be built on a blueprinted 700 Remington Stainless Steel Long Action, on a Peak 44 Blackrock 20 oz Carbon stock, with PTG BDL bottom metal and magazine. which are inside the 90 day window when ordered 2 weeks ago. I considered the 35 Whelen along with the 338 for some time, but after considering everything, small and large, long and short range, the 338 seemed best suited because of it's better flatter shooting ability for long range on the smaller game.

I think the 180 grain bullet Noslers 180 AB, is easily capable of 3000 fps. I also understand hunting accuracy. This rifle is being built as a definite deer and antelope rifle in as light a package as I can go, while still offering the ability to use a 200 grain bullet and produce enough accuracy to take Elk sized game out 400 or more yards. With both bullets still retaining enough velocity, to allow expansion and give enough energy for high percentage one shot kill's, with limited tracking. I also think if Moose were ever a possibility, mainly because of affordability, or other bigger dangerous game, this cartridge is still quite capable with the 250 Partition, and healthy loads for inside 200 yards, which most consider the longest shots likely to be encountered on these animals.

My first goal will be loading 200 grain BT's, or SST's with N-135 or XBR8208 for fireforming and practice rounds. But the first fired brass will begin with my initial search for a hunting round with the 180 grain AccuBond and Varget. I've seen others report good accuracy with this combo and most have no problem getting the 3000 fps velocity doing it that I am after. I think .5moa 3 shot cold barrel groups are possible, with this light of a rifle. One thing I know is hunting accuracy, and rifle range accuracy on a bench in ideal conditions are two totally different things! I also know, the lighter the rifle, the more accuracy you trade for that convenient carrying rifle.

The 180 load is for sure going to get used, and if later I find the 200 as accurate, or close, I'll look at only one load for both. I would love to get .75moa with the heavier bullets, but even 1"moa works on the larger Elk with more accuracy than needed for quick clean kills, with ample power. It even leaves the possibility for enough accuracy and energy for 500 if a perfect opportunity was ever given.

In both cases, at the furthest range mentioned, both bullets still have enough retained velocity to expand, and give a little forgiveness the human error of less than ideal shot placement. I also have not ruled out a second barrel, same contour 257 AI barrel for the deer and antelope, and even open up sheep possabilities, but for me that is likely out of the question in my physical condition at my age, as well as on my income! But it is not currently being planned, and why I didn't go with the Whelen. I am trying to satisfy my wants with just one gun, knowing the 257 AI for long range smaller big game, and the 35 Whelen would have an advantage over the 338 for the biggest game. I just hope I have another 10 years of ability, and desire, to use this rifle, before I leave it to my grandson, who I hope will appreciate and use it.

Anyways, this is not I would build this or that, it is already a done deal, and the 338-06 AI is the cartridge, and the components are already paid for. But I sure would appreciate all the experiences of others with this cartridge, loads, and components. As well as there own pros and cons they've encountered with it.
 
Welcome, and it looks like you have thought it out well. Sounds like it will be a great build and look forward to seeing the finished rifle. I've toyed back and forth a while ago between the 338 or 35, decided the 338-06 would be the way I'd go, never came to fruition. The AI would make it that much better.
Looking forward to hearing about the journey.
 
Welcome to the forum. Sure sounds like a well thought out plan. Nothing wrong with the 338-06 AI for all around use. Consider some of the light mono bullets too like the Barnes 185 TTSX or something similar from other companies. 180 gr AccuBond combined with a similar weight mono would handle anything you probably want to do.
One thing I will never again do, especially for deer and smaller big game, is shoot a solid copper or monolith bullet. Even hard cast is more favorable for me in the big bore revolvers. The reason I say never again is, I will not use 12 ga. for deer again when I am limited to no bottleneck cartridges. In the past decades, the Remington Solid Coppers were my choice. But never in a centerfire rifle cartridge, I will use bonded, or the M/L, and I use my own cast 45 Caliber Keith bullet today, Old School mostly with the exception of an inline.

But in any centerfire from ground squirrel where I want disintegrated bullets, to BT or other hollow points for bigger varmints. But for all up to the most dangerous game in the world, a Jacketed lead core bullet will always be my vote for the absolute most reliable. Todays Bonded Core's for all but the most demanding dangerous game, and for them, Partitions from Nosler or Swift will always get my vote. Again, for expansion, and retaining high percentage weight to finish the job, this is what I will always rely on.

I am so sold on the Bonded not just for their performance on both expansion and weight retention, but the Accubonds accuracy is unequalled for long range needs in a reliable hunting round with the greatest velocity variance I've seen. Just to many years seeing how not just are bullets, but all components have evolved!

I also didn't mention it, but I think like the other builds I've done in the last decade or so, especially since this is a Large Primer gun, I will probably bush the bolt and run a smaller dia. firing pin. All my rifles but one older Varmint rig now have the upgraded firing system. it is not that much more, and my gunsmith always tunes my firing system when he times and trues the bolt. But if any have never had this done, be aware, looking at primers for bur's or thinking never blanking a primer is a part of looking for excessive pressure, forget it. Once your bolt and firing system is setup for the smaller primer pin, when you see a sign of pressure looking at your primers, your already in dangerous territory!
 
I have not played with the 338-06 AI, but do have a 338-06, built on a LH Rem 700, with a 22" King chrome moly barrel w/ NECG iron sights, in a nutmeg laminated Wenig stock. I have a Leupold VX-3 3-10x40 B&C scope in Leupold QR rings and bases, and it returns too zero consistently when I take the scope off and reattach it. I did not go with the AI as I was not looking to fireform brass for this rifle (my only AI is the 250 Savage).
I built this when I was having shoulder issues, and the recoil of the 338 Win Mag was an issue. The rifle is on the heavy side, but shoots so well that I have not wanted to play with its weight and fix what ain't broke...so it's not my mountain rifle! And it's easy on the shoulder!

I have been lucky; the factory Wby 210 NP ammo shoots 1/2" groups at 2750 fps, and handloads w/ 210 gr NP's and 215 gr SGK's shoot 1/2" groups at 2749 and 2751 fps respectively. I have not played with lighter bullets (180 gr AB) in it, but do have a load for the 200 gr BT that produces 2980 fps and shoots .787" groups. The 215 gr SGK load retains more than 2000 fps and over 2000 ft. lbs. of energy at 400 yards, and drops 23" with a 200 yard zero. At 500 yards, it is still moving along at 1900 fps and has over 1700 ft. lbs. of energy, and drops 46.5".
I have taken one black bear with it at 120 yards with the SGK load, and it worked just fine; quick kill w/ complete pass through.

Today, if I want to shoot 180 gr AB's in a 338 caliber, I do so in my 338 Federal. Although my plan is to work up a good load with the 200 gr AB at approx. 2650 fps out of a 22" barrel.. This will retain over 1900 fps and 1600 ft. lbs. of energy at 400 yards, dropping 26" with a 200 yard zero.
For a factory load, my rifle is really liking the Federal 200 gr Trophy Copper ammo at 2579 fps and produces .457" groups. I took a nice 3 year old bull moose at 25 yards this past season. He went about 5 yards before expiring. (Complete pass through)

Those I know who have the AI version are also using the 210-225 gr bullets, and are getting the same velocities as I am, or slightly less.

Hope your build turns out to your expectations! And may you have many more years of great adventures with it!
 
I have not played with the 338-06 AI, but do have a 338-06, built on a LH Rem 700, with a 22" King chrome moly barrel w/ NECG iron sights, in a nutmeg laminated Wenig stock. I have a Leupold VX-3 3-10x40 B&C scope in Leupold QR rings and bases, and it returns too zero consistently when I take the scope off and reattach it. I did not go with the AI as I was not looking to fireform brass for this rifle (my only AI is the 250 Savage).
I built this when I was having shoulder issues, and the recoil of the 338 Win Mag was an issue. The rifle is on the heavy side, but shoots so well that I have not wanted to play with its weight and fix what ain't broke...so it's not my mountain rifle! And it's easy on the shoulder!

I have been lucky; the factory Wby 210 NP ammo shoots 1/2" groups at 2750 fps, and handloads w/ 210 gr NP's and 215 gr SGK's shoot 1/2" groups at 2749 and 2751 fps respectively. I have not played with lighter bullets (180 gr AB) in it, but do have a load for the 200 gr BT that produces 2980 fps and shoots .787" groups. The 215 gr SGK load retains more than 2000 fps and over 2000 ft. lbs. of energy at 400 yards, and drops 23" with a 200 yard zero. At 500 yards, it is still moving along at 1900 fps and has over 1700 ft. lbs. of energy, and drops 46.5".
I have taken one black bear with it at 120 yards with the SGK load, and it worked just fine; quick kill w/ complete pass through.

Today, if I want to shoot 180 gr AB's in a 338 caliber, I do so in my 338 Federal. Although my plan is to work up a good load with the 200 gr AB at approx. 2650 fps out of a 22" barrel.. This will retain over 1900 fps and 1600 ft. lbs. of energy at 400 yards, dropping 26" with a 200 yard zero.
For a factory load, my rifle is really liking the Federal 200 gr Trophy Copper ammo at 2579 fps and produces .457" groups. I took a nice 3 year old bull moose at 25 yards this past season. He went about 5 yards before expiring. (Complete pass through)

Those I know who have the AI version are also using the 210-225 gr bullets, and are getting the same velocities as I am, or slightly less.

Hope your build turns out to your expectations! And may you have many more years of great adventures with it!
Good information, thank you. One thing I won't be doing is using factory, or anyone else's loads in my rifles. I been loading for over 50 years and in the past 3 decades have never shot anything but my own handloads in my centerfire rifles and handguns. Main reason, I want total control and the ability to duplicate my ammo to the highest degree possible. I also agree with your rifle shooting as good and with various ammo as you spoke, to leave well enough alone.

I also believe your reasoning would be different if you wanted only one rifle for the reasons I am building this. I am aiming for as close to 7# as I can with this rifle complete. I don't want to add a brake, and understand it will shoot a little larger groups (3 shot from cold barrel) without one, and the lighter I go, the larger those groups will be.

The reason for me starting this load development is Antelope, and Deer, hopefully Mule Deer as well as Whitetail. This where I will need the best accuracy more than absolute energy. I only need enough retained speed to give me enough to promote expansion of the 180 AccuBond. I chose this bullet for it's reliability to expand at 1800 fps, with enough energy to drive on thru these animals out beyond 500 yards, and possibly a bit further. I think 3000 fps is realistic, not only in this caliber, but to give outstanding accuracy with less work than other options. As I said, this is what this rifle will get the most use for.

I am not decided on the load for even bigger game from Elk to all but the most dangerous game. Which I hope to use this rifle for, but acquiring tags is becoming more difficult for those game species. But again 200 or 225 grain Accubonds is where I will pursue my efforts for this type of hunting. I keep mentioning the Accubonds for two reasons, it's known ability to reliably expand at the velocities this cartridge delivers, at the yardages it is likely to be used at, while retaining most of it's weight and enough energy to finish the job. Also because of, like the 180, it's track record for fine accuracy, and the ease at which it is obtained. I really only worry about 400 yards for this load, possibly 500 on a rare occasion, on larger game, and less critical need for accuracy, 3/4"moa to even 1"moa will put success totally on me, and as you have stated with the 210's thats a given.

Those 250 partitions are 100% reliable even at 200 yards, which is probably further than Dangerous game or Moose would ever be needed for. Soeven 1 1/2moa or a little more is all that I would be concerned with for this type game, in the environment's I would be hunting them, which is increasingly unlikely today with my recourses!
 
I agree...the AccuBond is a great bullet, and been my favourite since it first came out!
It has proven very easy to find good loads for any caliber/cartridge I have loaded for, from .257 to .375 caliber, has always produced acceptable to great accuracy, and has been a proven performer on game over the past couple of decades, from antelope to bison (so covering the lighter to the heavy animals).
It is the first bullet that I think of trying in new, or new-to-me, rifles for testing potential accuracy.
I too look at performance out to 500 yards, but realistically am not likely to be shooting that far at game, unless wounded and I have no other choice. Over the past 38 years of hunting big game (antelope to bison - in the thick bush, open prairies and alpine), my average shot distance is just 132 yards (distances ranging from 5 to 475 yards), and I can count on one hand the number of animals taken at over 400 yards.

I will say that I have been happy with Sierra's SGK bullets over the years, and the .338 215 gr is working very well in my 338-06. It is light enough for good velocity (2750 fps), has a thicker jacket for better penetration, and proven to be a consistent accuracy performer in various calibers over the years. Due to its better BC, it will outperform the 210 gr Partition in a 338 Win Mag for retained velocity and energy past 300 yards!

I wouldn't hesitate to use a lighter bullet on moose. But our moose are the Canadian version. While larger and a little heavier than the Shiras, they are not over tenacious of life and do not take a lot to kill reliably on average. The Alaska Yukon version is a different beast as they can nearly double in weight to the smaller species. That extra mass (thicker skin, heavier muscle and bone) requires more energy and a higher SD to reliably penetrate (180 gr AB has a SD of .225 and the 185 gr TSX has a SD of .231). I do believe that the 200 gr bullets with a SD .250 is a better choice for moose, and the 210 gr (SD of .263), 215 gr (SD of .269), 225 (SD of .281), and 250 gr (SD of .313) are better choices for the largest of the subspecies. (Not sure which moose you want to hunt, should you get the opportunity)
Also, moose are not hard to get within reasonable shooting ranges of, especially during the rut when it can get very close and personal. The longest shot I have taken on moose over the years is 220 yards. So, the lighter bullets will work fine on the smaller subspecies at closer distances.
The 30-06 with 180 gr bullets has been a great moose-getter over the decades on Canadian moose, and even the 338 Federal with the 180 gr AB produces better velocity and energy than the 30-06 does. The 338 Federal is still carrying over 1900 fps and just under 1500 ft. lbs. of energy at 400 yards. Increase the velocity in 338-06, and it will perform at the next level. (Since I tend to stick to one bullet weight per cartridge, I haven't crunched the numbers for the 180 gr AB for my 338-06. I plan on the 200 gr for the Federal, and 215 gr or 225 gr for the 338-06. I have picked up some 225 gr AccuBond ammo to try in the 338-06 and have yet to try it)

I will also say that a new bullet that I am experiencing great results with is the Federal Terminal Ascent. It is also producing great accuracy and on-game performance in the majority of rifles I have tried it in to date. It is also a bonded bullet, and is supposed to reliably expand at lower velocities (down to 1400 fps), yet retain weight and shape for reliable expansion and penetration at higher velocities too. Looking at the pictures of the expanded bullets, I believe that I would still prefer to keep shots to within ranges where the velocity is still about 1700 fps as the expansion is better for more tissue damage for a quicker kill. But this is just my opinion.
It is also available as components, and so far I have been able to get hold of the 6.5 130 gr and 270 136 gr versions, but have not had a chance to try them in handloads yet. At this time they are only available in .264 (130 gr), .277 (136 gr), .284 (155 and 170 gr), and .308 calibers (175 and 200 gr).
I would love to see a .338 bullet...perhaps in a 215 gr??? (they seem to prefer the lighter weights for the most part) It would perform very well in 338 cartridges.
 
Back
Top