Despite being a 1911 and revolver guy, I now own a Glock.
I decided I wanted to get a 10mm handgun for some AK hunts I have coming up. Not because I probably need it when I'll have a 300 win mag, but because I want it. There are scenarios where I see it being nice to leave the rifle at camp too. 3 of us are hunting and if I tag out or am packing meat I might prefer to just have the handgun. Also using trekking poles to cross tundra I might want to have my rifle attached to my pack and not real handy. Fishing is another spot I might not have the rifle real handy.
My old Redhawk 44 was a nice gun, but really heavy and so large framed it's a bit tough for me to cock as I draw it. I decided my S&W 386 XL Hunter in 357 was better for me to pack than the 44 because I shot it better. I love that gun. It's now discontinued and would be hard to replace so I'm trying to leave it in the safe a bit more often.
I figured if I was going to go with something else I'd get a lighter weight 10mm with a rail and that I could get night sights for. I considered a S&W 329 or 69 in 44, but a light 44 sounded like a kicking sucker to me with the loads I'd want to use. After deciding to go 10mm I initially wanted to go 1911, but the ones with the features I liked are among the heaviest ones. Also field stripping a 1911 I get full of crud hunting in a swamp or fishing on a sandy river is a bit more of a process than taking a Glock or similar gun apart. The Sig 220 SA I considered is also a pretty heavy and pricey option.
All that lead me to grudgingly look at striker fired semi autos. Honestly I might have been better off with the Springfield, but I went with the Glock. I say that because I'm changing out the barrel on the Glock for hardcast ammo. I ordered a KKM 6" barrel for the G20.
I have about 50 rounds through the factory Glock so far, I've only owned it a few days. I'm pretty impresed. I don't love the trigger and at first I pointed it high, but that's going away as I shoot it more. The trigger is not like my worked over revolver or 1911's, but it doesn't seem to affect my accuracy much. Out to 35 yards whatever I shoot at (mostly a 5" rolling target or gatorade bottles so far) seems to get hit. My first shot blew up a 12oz can at 25 yards. The factory sights are hitting perfect with the 180gr Fiocchi loads I got with it. I have no real complaints about the gun and am really enjoying shooting it.
I put my Streamlight TLR-1 on it and it fits and functions well. I like it well enought that when I ordered Razco holsters I got them to fit the light. I got a plain chest holster, and the one that works with my FHF bino harness. Since I was getting holsters longer to accomodate the light I ordered the 6" KKM barrel when I ordered. A set of XS F8 night sights complete the mods I'm doing to the Glock.
One thing about buying a Glock, it's kinda like a Remington 700 or AR. Anything they make for a handgun they make for a Glock.
It really seems like it's pretty perfect for what I got it for (or will be). It's reasonably light compared to other options, reasonably priced, and has the features I want. A S&W 69 was the next cheapest option I looked at and once I'd add sights and a trigger job to that it would be more than the Glock with the sights and barrel.
Anyway, just figured I'd share this for anyone thinking of getting one.
I decided I wanted to get a 10mm handgun for some AK hunts I have coming up. Not because I probably need it when I'll have a 300 win mag, but because I want it. There are scenarios where I see it being nice to leave the rifle at camp too. 3 of us are hunting and if I tag out or am packing meat I might prefer to just have the handgun. Also using trekking poles to cross tundra I might want to have my rifle attached to my pack and not real handy. Fishing is another spot I might not have the rifle real handy.
My old Redhawk 44 was a nice gun, but really heavy and so large framed it's a bit tough for me to cock as I draw it. I decided my S&W 386 XL Hunter in 357 was better for me to pack than the 44 because I shot it better. I love that gun. It's now discontinued and would be hard to replace so I'm trying to leave it in the safe a bit more often.
I figured if I was going to go with something else I'd get a lighter weight 10mm with a rail and that I could get night sights for. I considered a S&W 329 or 69 in 44, but a light 44 sounded like a kicking sucker to me with the loads I'd want to use. After deciding to go 10mm I initially wanted to go 1911, but the ones with the features I liked are among the heaviest ones. Also field stripping a 1911 I get full of crud hunting in a swamp or fishing on a sandy river is a bit more of a process than taking a Glock or similar gun apart. The Sig 220 SA I considered is also a pretty heavy and pricey option.
All that lead me to grudgingly look at striker fired semi autos. Honestly I might have been better off with the Springfield, but I went with the Glock. I say that because I'm changing out the barrel on the Glock for hardcast ammo. I ordered a KKM 6" barrel for the G20.
I have about 50 rounds through the factory Glock so far, I've only owned it a few days. I'm pretty impresed. I don't love the trigger and at first I pointed it high, but that's going away as I shoot it more. The trigger is not like my worked over revolver or 1911's, but it doesn't seem to affect my accuracy much. Out to 35 yards whatever I shoot at (mostly a 5" rolling target or gatorade bottles so far) seems to get hit. My first shot blew up a 12oz can at 25 yards. The factory sights are hitting perfect with the 180gr Fiocchi loads I got with it. I have no real complaints about the gun and am really enjoying shooting it.
I put my Streamlight TLR-1 on it and it fits and functions well. I like it well enought that when I ordered Razco holsters I got them to fit the light. I got a plain chest holster, and the one that works with my FHF bino harness. Since I was getting holsters longer to accomodate the light I ordered the 6" KKM barrel when I ordered. A set of XS F8 night sights complete the mods I'm doing to the Glock.
One thing about buying a Glock, it's kinda like a Remington 700 or AR. Anything they make for a handgun they make for a Glock.
It really seems like it's pretty perfect for what I got it for (or will be). It's reasonably light compared to other options, reasonably priced, and has the features I want. A S&W 69 was the next cheapest option I looked at and once I'd add sights and a trigger job to that it would be more than the Glock with the sights and barrel.
Anyway, just figured I'd share this for anyone thinking of getting one.