That's one of the rifles/cartridges mentioned alot but man, mine ain't too bad at all. Must've gotten lucky with it mostly as it is a pretty nice thumper.ever shoot a remington 660 in 350 rem mag at game? you notice it, trust me!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That's one of the rifles/cartridges mentioned alot but man, mine ain't too bad at all. Must've gotten lucky with it mostly as it is a pretty nice thumper.ever shoot a remington 660 in 350 rem mag at game? you notice it, trust me!
I want one of those...ever shoot a remington 660 in 350 rem mag at game? you notice it, trust me!
I have killed a bunch of elk to 400 yards, and some further, with the performance level of the 7mm-08.I have been using a 300 WSM for elk for years and love the gun, but any more I have the bug for a mellower, lighter recoil, elk caliber. Nearly every elk I have ever shot has been within 400 yds. I grew up with the 30-06 and am considering switching back to this. Others in mind are 270, 7mm-08, or something in the 6.5s. Never owned any of the latter but do have some 270 experience. The 270 and 30-06 would be hindered by twist for any of the new LR bullets, but I don't know that I care. Any thoughts or suggestions?
I've only recently been messing around with a 6.5 PRC.
It will!Accuracy potential is strong, and I'm sure it would work fine for elk, up close or out to 400+ yards.
Guy
It might be due to the stock design. I've shot a couple of 700's and they were no different than the 35 Whelen.ever shoot a remington 660 in 350 rem mag at game? you notice it, trust me!
Yep. One of the first lightweight hunting rifles. They were made after Remington brought out the XP-100. Basically the same action, just designated as a rifle, and had action screws in a different location and a cut-out for a blind magazine.Ever shoot a Remington 660 in 350 rem mag at game? you notice it, trust me!
Never! I hate brakes.put a good brake on it!
I hate those with the small ports in them, the Holland types are loud but just a big boom compared to the sharp painful ear piercing bark of the KDF types. I have used them to take whitetails to .77 miles and have never not saw the bullet impact through the scope!Never! I hate brakes.
I have been using a 300 WSM for elk for years and love the gun, but any more I have the bug for a mellower, lighter recoil, elk caliber. Nearly every elk I have ever shot has been within 400 yds. I grew up with the 30-06 and am considering switching back to this. Others in mind are 270, 7mm-08, or something in the 6.5s. Never owned any of the latter but do have some 270 experience. The 270 and 30-06 would be hindered by twist for any of the new LR bullets, but I don't know that I care. Any thoughts or suggestions?
I don't know why, but I ALWAYS look past the .308 for elk. I have no good reason to.Skip right on past the 30-06 and go with the 308. It's a mild mannered, inherantly accurate cartridge that punches far outside its weight class.
Must be a bias. The .308 is a fine cartridge, but it isn't better than the 30-06. Either will accomplish all that a hunter will ever need for most of NA. Few of us are sufficiently talented to take advantage of the minor differences between these two cartridges. The man armed with either of these will find that he is more than adequately equipped to hunt most of the world. I like 'em both.I don't know why, but I ALWAYS look past the .308 for elk. I have no good reason to.