bullet
Handloader
- Dec 26, 2007
- 4,975
- 18
Yes, the 250-300 Savage would have been so much better and a much better round for a special edition rifle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
...................Even though Hornady, a direct competetor of Nosler and Ruger developed the .375 Ruger jointly, the real bottom line IMO and what should matter to Nosler is sales, sales and sales!.......If Nosler wishes to offer only what they consider to be classic cartridges, as opposed to the merits of any newer round, that is all well and good........ But in the case of the 375 Ruger, I think that the Nosler 48`s would sell very well. Nosler offers the WSM`s, do they not? Why? Regardless of whom the developers of the WSM`s were, they offer the WSM`s because of their proven merits and the growing popularity of the shorter action rifles. The WSM`s certainly aren`t classic cartridges...............Setting aside bias, emotion, who developed what and competetion, IMO, a new cartridge offering should be based strictly on the proven merits, popularity or growing popularity of the cartridge alone, and no other reason!...............The .375 Ruger has been successfully developed, refined, tested and has been proven on the ranges and in the hunting fields world-wide. It shoots the same bullets as the 375 H&H, has slighty better ballistics and does so in a shorter 30-06 length action..........So what if the H&H round has 95 years of proven seniority! In todays world, does a fairly new cartridge need years to prove itself to be successful? IMO,,absolutely not!........... Since modern day cartridge designers and developers know already what works and what doesn`t, a round can be developed and refined with specific goals in mind via modern day computers, equipment and design technologies; testing its accuracy, velocities, feeding, extraction, brass, pressures, etc. etc., and/or basically anything else needed to develop, refine and test a round!...... Before 1912, none of this modern day technology existed nor did the modern day propellants and yet look at the success of the H&H round through the nine + decades!........There are those who say that the .375 Ruger still needs to be proven? HOGWASH! BULL-ONEY! Proven to do what? What`s to prove? Given the same tube length and because its casing holds more powder, it shoots the same weight bullets at slightly better velocities than the H&H....... Regardless of the H&H`s 95 year seniority, its great world-wide hunting success and the bias of many towards it, the .375 Ruger is simply a better and more efficient cartridge. It is so, BECAUSE of its modern day development and design............Nosler! If you later chamber the .375 Ruger and offer it in a custom, do so on its proven merits alone!jgradyo":1ylypt0u said:I think it is less a matter of legality or bias as it might be one of pride. The .375 Ruger was a joint project of Ruger and Hornady. With so many other good options out there, it would be hard to imagine the Noslers chambering their flagship custom rifle for a cartridge whose history starts with their closest competitor. I couldn't fault that logic, either, if I'm putting myself in their boots.Big Squeeze":1ylypt0u said:If there are no patents or a proprietary cartridge, then why not go for the Ruger round and offer it??.....Yeah! I know! Maybe alot of bias for the `ol 375 H&H???
...............Correct!............And get this too!!.. My dealer who owns 2 of the largest gun stores in the county where I live, can`t keep enough .375 Rugers in stock, Hawkeyes or Alaskans. According to him, they are out-selling all the other rifle brands chambered in the 375 H&H by a 5 to 1 margin!!........That applies to not only to new .375 buyers, but also to EXISTING .375 H&H owners, who are trading in their older 375 H&H`s for the newer Ruger round because they can maintain the same or get better performance and do so from a shorter and in some cases, a lighter package!.............Howa and CZ are joining the 375 Ruger bandwagon. And, there will be others!! The reasons are quite obvious!HunterJim":2om90yye said:Steyr-Mannlicher is chambering the .375 Ruger, I handled one at SHOT this year. Even with their .376 Steyr (which has not been promoted or sold well).
I think the point is to spread the capabilities of the rifle, and the .375 Ruger permits hunting dangerous game and fits in a standard length action.
jim
I thought I was alone wanting something like that. The rifle I shoot most often is a .22 Hornet - I'm in groundhog country, and my Ruger and I don't miss much inside 150 yards.
What're you thinking? .257 Roberts? .25-06? .220 Swift? .204 Ruger even?
Seekers of the red mist, chime in!
(BTW, old #7, I read your NCR .280 AI account with great interest. I took delivery of mine just this evening.)
OH Brother would I be tempted to buy a 257 AI in an NCR. Not sure why, but that caliber has held my attention. Not huge like most of my stuff, just different.
CC.
Canuck-jtoews80":1nd8k2xk said:I thought I was alone wanting something like that. The rifle I shoot most often is a .22 Hornet - I'm in groundhog country, and my Ruger and I don't miss much inside 150 yards.
What're you thinking? .257 Roberts? .25-06? .220 Swift? .204 Ruger even?
Seekers of the red mist, chime in!
(BTW, old #7, I read your NCR .280 AI account with great interest. I took delivery of mine just this evening.)
OH Brother would I be tempted to buy a 257 AI in an NCR. Not sure why, but that caliber has held my attention. Not huge like most of my stuff, just different.
CC.
Yes, it is official - there will be five calibers, 500 rifles each, in the series.Dave Regan":2hnccjuj said:Previously in these posts, I have seen references to the Nosler Custom Rifles as being a series of five. (five different calibres) Is this official or is it something that I have read into the various posts on the subject. Just curious.
By the way have the .270 Winchesters started their run yet?
old gmc.
The 6.5-284