Notice: This site is not mobile friendly, we recommend you download tapatalk for a mobile friendly experience of our forum.

It is currently Sat Sep 18, 2021 11:54 am

Shop Nosler

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:08 pm 

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 am
Posts: 1962
MjMichigan's post about the 180 gr RN and Hornady specs saying it expanded just down to 2400 had me very curious. I did not believe that bullet was near that hard or tough.

Tests came out pretty much as I expected.

First test was at my normal load which will run about 2725 in my 22" barrel. Distance was 20 yds so impact velocity would've been in the neighborhood of 2665.

Didn't hit the jugs quite where I wanted on the first test and the bullet kind of went out the side of the 4'th jug and through the side of the 5'th jug and bounced off the edge of the 6'th jug. Running full width of the jugs I'd say it will for sure be in the 4'th jug, possibly in the 5'th.

Obliterated the first 2 jugs. Bullet peeled all the way back pretty much even with the bottom of the shank. Measured .645 at the widest, and weighed 108 gr's. Would be a whitetail thumper at woods ranges, probably overkill on damage if hitting shoulder.

Image

Image


I then loaded the same bullet with 35.5 gr's of H4895. Estimated muzzle velocity figuring 20 fps loss per inch of barrel with my 22" compared to 24" data, was 1985-2035 FPS. Estimated impact was 1925-1975.

That bullet was in the 6'th jug. Actual lead nose was wider because the faster speed of the 1'st bullet melted most of the lead off the front and the width of the bullet on the faster 1 was the copper shank peels. This measured .575-.600 on average around it, but was in a lopsided fashion underneath. Weighed 143 gr's. So much for only expanding down to 2400.


Image

Image


A comparison of the 2. Normal load of 2725 on right, 2000fps give or take on left.

Image

Image


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 6:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:08 pm
Posts: 20969
Location: Cedar Springs, MI
Looks like a winner to me. You can hunt deer with confidence and never look back. All you need now is a sharp knife.

JD338

_________________
Speed sells but Accuracy kills.

Noslers Rock


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 6:56 pm 

Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:20 pm
Posts: 30845
Location: Northern Virginia
That looks like a great test. Makes it much more clear in my head. Thanks ST

_________________
SEMPER FIDELIS

Actually, there are only two classes of people posting here: Model 70 owners and those who wish they had one. PATENT PENDING


Last edited by SJB358 on Thu Jul 29, 2021 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 7:11 pm 

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:43 am
Posts: 830
Shade thanks for your time and effort providing this info. That bullet as you say and proved will be a deer thumper no doubt. Dan.

_________________
It don't matter how fast you miss.


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:07 pm 

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:16 am
Posts: 1437
With that amount of penetration and expansion, both will certainly kill deer. Nice jug test. (y)

_________________
Mark


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:37 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 2117
Thanks for doing that Shade Tree.

I don’t have a good spot to do do a test. City limits issue.

I spent to day posting a new piece of property.

I’ll load up the rest of the box of 180 RN.

That will be a handy load.

That was a nice looking mushroom too, even the one with 4895.

Did get a brick of MLP primers today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 10:31 pm 

Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 2:49 pm
Posts: 33875
Location: Northern British Columbia
You're golden for deer with that bullet. Ecellent test.

_________________
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:58 am 

Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2019 4:50 pm
Posts: 418
No doubt that will get the job done from deer on up to large game in fine fashion. Thanks for taking the time for the test.

_________________
Joe


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 4:49 am 

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 am
Posts: 1962
MjcMichigan, Unless you're pressed for time with an early season starting soon, I'd still test your own bullets if you get a chance. Maybe they changed something? I have roughly 400 of these bullets and some are pretty old.

I tested out of one of the newer looking boxes, if I had to guess I'd say they were made in the 90's, early 2000's. But that's still 20-30 yrs ago.


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:30 am 

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 2117
Thank you for the heads up and disclaimer…

TJay put his finger on it.

I didn’t read the heading properly…

It says muzzle velocity range….

What a strange heading. I’ll call hornady, and while I have them of the phone I’ll ask if the spec has changed over the decades.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:51 am 

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 am
Posts: 1962
mjcmichigan wrote:
Thank you for the heads up and disclaimer…

TJay put his finger on it.

I didn’t read the heading properly…

It says muzzle velocity range….

What a strange heading. I’ll call hornady, and while I have them of the phone I’ll ask if the spec has changed over the decades.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Yeah that makes more sense. They probably have a parameter that they figure that RN bullet will be used at, and know what it will expand down to........say for example 250 yds maximum shot would be taken with that bullet. With a set minimum velocity of 2400 and that B.C., that would have it down to about 1600 fps at 250 yds.


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:29 am 

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 2117
Called Hornady Tech support today and talked to Brad.

He confirmed the following….

1) the #3075 Interlock 180 RN should expand down to about 1800fps when expansion should slow down a lot.

2) no changes to interlock design. 30 yr old interlocks should be the same.

Thanks again for the testing the 180RN at speed and reduced loads.


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 7:49 am 

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 am
Posts: 1962
mjcmichigan wrote:
Called Hornady Tech support today and talked to Brad.

He confirmed the following….

1) the #3075 Interlock 180 RN should expand down to about 1800fps when expansion should slow down a lot.

2) no changes to interlock design. 30 yr old interlocks should be the same.

Thanks again for the testing the 180RN at speed and reduced loads.



Good deal. Nice to have all the info. So at that and your starting speeds of roughly 2825 fps, you would be good out to 300 yds as far as expansion. Way farther than I'd figure on using a RN bullet at.

With the minimum of 2400 fps, it would get you out to between 175-200 yds. More in line with what I'd figure as a maximum distance for that bullet. If I'm carrying that bullet it would be in areas where I couldn't ever see to shoot more than 150 yds period, and almost all shots would be well under 100 yds.


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:28 am 

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 am
Posts: 1962
MjcMichigan, just another tidbit of information. At the slower MV speed of roughly 2000 fps, the first jug was blown apart with the 1 half laying a full 15 ft directly to the right. The other half to the left was more in smaller pieces. Nothing 100% scientific you can take from that, but to me it means that even at the slower speed the bullet has rapid initial expansion.

As far as a tougher bullet in standard C&C, the Speer HC's and Sierra PH's in 180 are tougher than the Interlock's. Plus the spitzer shape vs the RN slows the initial expansion down. But these bullets would be far better than those 2 would be for whitetail IMO, and would still be adequate for black bear.


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:12 pm 

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:42 pm
Posts: 365
Location: MI
Good going ShadeTree. That is some great expansion at 2700+ fps.

Not that it matters but the roughly 2000 fps impact images are little more expanded than what I see with my friends Krag loads. Might be due to the close range and differing rifling, or differences in media (water vs game). I think he said he was comfortable with impact velocities down around 1700 fps; from what I recall him telling me the expansion isn't as strong but it still is adequate sub 1800 fps. Honestly he usually loads pretty light to begin with to avoid meat damage / "max expansion" of bullets.

Glad the velocity mystery was solved.

Any reason to not re-post the OP or move this to the bullet test section of the forum?


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:30 pm 

Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:20 pm
Posts: 30845
Location: Northern Virginia
I bet that’s a good Bullet in a 300 Savage as well. Been awhile since I’ve rang mine out. I’ll have to look around for some.

_________________
SEMPER FIDELIS

Actually, there are only two classes of people posting here: Model 70 owners and those who wish they had one. PATENT PENDING


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 6:17 pm 

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 am
Posts: 1962
Here's 1 more pic just to give a different perspective from a side view so to speak. The 2725 fps bullet is actually pretty impressive. Jacket peeled all the way back even with the base all the way around. Like a domed mushroom covering the stem. I'd say 2650-2850 would be optimal for whitetail depending on how far a typical shot would be.

The really slow impact speed had trouble peeling back the jacket in a uniform fashion, but would obviously still get the job done.


Imagewindows screen capture


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 6:29 pm 

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 am
Posts: 1962
Nimrod84 wrote:
Good going ShadeTree. That is some great expansion at 2700+ fps.

Not that it matters but the roughly 2000 fps impact images are little more expanded than what I see with my friends Krag loads. Might be due to the close range and differing rifling, or differences in media (water vs game). I think he said he was comfortable with impact velocities down around 1700 fps; from what I recall him telling me the expansion isn't as strong but it still is adequate sub 1800 fps. Honestly he usually loads pretty light to begin with to avoid meat damage / "max expansion" of bullets.

Glad the velocity mystery was solved.

Any reason to not re-post the OP or move this to the bullet test section of the forum?



Yeah not sure what the difference would be for sure? I will say based on what I seen from jugs exploding, at full speed and close range, a person would want to try and stay off the shoulder or there's likely to be a big mess.

I can copy and paste the initial write up and post the pics in the bullet test section.


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2021 6:49 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 11:10 am
Posts: 1834
I wish you could find for RN bullets these days. It seems the spitzers have almost made them extinct. I’ve always though the round nose design made beautiful mushrooms. Would love to find som 175 grain RN for my little 275 rigby. Unfortunately I have had zero luck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 5:12 am 

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 am
Posts: 1962
Cleveland48 wrote:
I wish you could find for RN bullets these days. It seems the spitzers have almost made them extinct. I’ve always though the round nose design made beautiful mushrooms. Would love to find som 175 grain RN for my little 275 rigby. Unfortunately I have had zero luck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro



They definitely have their use depending on the application, and in the right application are not inferior but a benefit IMO.

Problem is in my view the public is convinced they need a slicked up high B.C bullet for 150 yd shots. Who would want to use that old log wagon of a bullet when better is well, just better in most views. So manufacture's produce what follows the hype and sells.

Speer is down to just 1 RN hunting bullet, and that is in .311. Sierra makes 2, both in 30 caliber, a 150 and a 180. Nosler 2 that I know of, both in 30 caliber. Hornady I think still makes the most but they dropped a bunch of them. The 30 caliber 180 RN is a limited production deal.


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 5:56 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 2117
ShadeTree wrote:
Cleveland48 wrote:
I wish you could find for RN bullets these days. It seems the spitzers have almost made them extinct. I’ve always though the round nose design made beautiful mushrooms. Would love to find som 175 grain RN for my little 275 rigby. Unfortunately I have had zero luck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro



They definitely have their use depending on the application, and in the right application are not inferior but a benefit IMO.

Problem is in my view the public is convinced they need a slicked up high B.C bullet for 150 yd shots. Who would want to use that old log wagon of a bullet when better is well, just better in most views. So manufacture's produce what follows the hype and sells.

Speer is down to just 1 RN hunting bullet, and that is in .311. Sierra makes 2, both in 30 caliber, a 150 and a 180. Nosler 2 that I know of, both in 30 caliber. Hornady I think still makes the most but they dropped a bunch of them. The 30 caliber 180 RN is a limited production deal.
Nosler also makes a CTBT in 458 300gn for 45/70. You can find them on the Nosler site with a little work. Also Winchester loads them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 5:58 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 2117
Picture of the 300gn RN 458 CTBT

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:00 pm 

Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:20 pm
Posts: 30845
Location: Northern Virginia
Jim has put a lot of meat in the freeze with that bullet. He made me a believer. I’ve seen a few shot with it as well and man, it expands beautifully and is a piledriver on bucks.

_________________
SEMPER FIDELIS

Actually, there are only two classes of people posting here: Model 70 owners and those who wish they had one. PATENT PENDING


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 3:48 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:42 am
Posts: 15990
Location: Washington State
I've got a huge respect for the good old round-nose bullets that were produced by many manufacturers.

Did well with the 375 H&H using 270 grain Hornady round-nose bullets at a match in Libby Montana two years ago. Never did use that bullet on game and now I'm out of them. Sadly Hornady doesn't make them anymore. That bullet surprised the heck out of me at 300 yards on targets. Very accurate.

These days my 45-70 is getting the 350 grain Round Nose Hornady when I think it should have a jacketed bullet. Wow - that thing is accurate too. Again, I've never taken game with it, but have a lot of confidence in it anyway, based on what I've heard and read from others.

Seems like the trend towards ultra high BC bullets has shunted off the good old round nose and flat nose bullets that filled so many tags for decades... I like a pointy spitzer too, but I hope someone keeps making good round nose hunting bullets.

Regards, Guy


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Jug tested the Hornady 180 RN.
PostPosted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 4:08 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 2117
I think there’s a lot of us!

That 375 H&H sounds good…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Moderators: NoslerV, Nosler4, JD338, NOSLER, FOTIS

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

This forum is:

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Theme created StylerBB.net