roysclockgun
Handloader
- Dec 17, 2005
- 736
- 1
Thanks to the group for all the valuable answers that I have gotten in the past!
I have been working up loads for my rifle chambered for 45-70. (See attached link for the photo.)
http://s101.photobucket.com/albums/m78/ ... G_5519.jpg
The barrel is a modern 22 inch replacement, chambered for 45-70, with a twist of one in 19 inches. The receiver began life as a 1885 British military rifle in .577 cal., then in 1897, was converted to chamber .303 British and sent to New Zealand. I don't know when the rifle was imported or when the conversion to 45-70 was done. The work appears to have been done professionally as well as the re blue. The trigger let off is smooth, albeit a little heavier than what I am used to in modern rifles.
I have new Winchester made brass and Berry bullets that are 350 gr. that Graf had on sale in boxes of 500 bullets. I am using standard Winchester large rifle primers.
I started hand loading with IMR3031 and reached 42 gr., at which point the rifle grouped very well at 100 yards, turning in 2 1/4" groups, using the open sights. I then switched over to IMR4064 and worked up to 44 gr., at which point I was getting the same group sizes as with the IMR3031.
I am happy with these groups and will now load simply for having fun with the piece at the range. The recoil is a healthy "thump", but not brutal. I am getting no measureable stretch in the brass after one firing.
My question is, does anyone see danger in continuing to use these loads in a 126 year old receiver? The ony other powder that I have on hand that appears to be suitable for this 45-70, is IMR4198. I have been told by some that I have to use US Springfield "Trapdoor" loads only. I have no desire to go above those levels anyway, but I have also read that the Martini-Henry action is stronger than is the "Trapdoor" action. Opinions please?
Best,
Steven
I have been working up loads for my rifle chambered for 45-70. (See attached link for the photo.)
http://s101.photobucket.com/albums/m78/ ... G_5519.jpg
The barrel is a modern 22 inch replacement, chambered for 45-70, with a twist of one in 19 inches. The receiver began life as a 1885 British military rifle in .577 cal., then in 1897, was converted to chamber .303 British and sent to New Zealand. I don't know when the rifle was imported or when the conversion to 45-70 was done. The work appears to have been done professionally as well as the re blue. The trigger let off is smooth, albeit a little heavier than what I am used to in modern rifles.
I have new Winchester made brass and Berry bullets that are 350 gr. that Graf had on sale in boxes of 500 bullets. I am using standard Winchester large rifle primers.
I started hand loading with IMR3031 and reached 42 gr., at which point the rifle grouped very well at 100 yards, turning in 2 1/4" groups, using the open sights. I then switched over to IMR4064 and worked up to 44 gr., at which point I was getting the same group sizes as with the IMR3031.
I am happy with these groups and will now load simply for having fun with the piece at the range. The recoil is a healthy "thump", but not brutal. I am getting no measureable stretch in the brass after one firing.
My question is, does anyone see danger in continuing to use these loads in a 126 year old receiver? The ony other powder that I have on hand that appears to be suitable for this 45-70, is IMR4198. I have been told by some that I have to use US Springfield "Trapdoor" loads only. I have no desire to go above those levels anyway, but I have also read that the Martini-Henry action is stronger than is the "Trapdoor" action. Opinions please?
Best,
Steven