7mm Rem Mag and 140 E-Tips

pharmseller

Handloader
Feb 13, 2012
550
79
I just bought a really nice Parker-Hale 1200 Super in 7mm Rem Mag. Made in 1967.

I'm thinking about using 140 grain E-Tips for load work up since 1. I have a bunch of them and b. 95% weight retention is like shooting a 200 grain bullet losing 35% of its weight.

Does anyone have experience with this bullet in this chambering? I have Magpro, H1000, and Retumbo to play with. WLRM and WLR primers.

Thanks,


P
 
Magpro should be real good with the 140, along with RL22 if you could find any of it.. Good luck and post up any of your results if you get a chance to shoot it..


Cartridge : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet : .284, 140, Nosler E-Tip 59955
Useable Case Capaci: 73.260 grain H2O = 4.757 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.290 inch = 83.57 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Accurate MAGPRO

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-20.0 81 58.40 2551 2023 32057 10691 84.6 1.480
-18.0 83 59.86 2618 2131 34251 11081 86.2 1.442
-16.0 85 61.32 2687 2244 36614 11463 87.7 1.405
-14.0 87 62.78 2756 2361 39158 11836 89.1 1.369
-12.0 89 64.24 2825 2481 41902 12199 90.5 1.333
-10.0 92 65.70 2895 2605 44864 12548 91.8 1.298
-08.0 94 67.16 2965 2733 48061 12883 93.0 1.264
-06.0 96 68.62 3036 2865 51510 13201 94.1 1.230
-04.0 98 70.08 3107 3001 55196 13501 95.2 1.191
-02.0 100 71.54 3178 3140 59149 13781 96.1 1.152 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 102 73.00 3250 3283 63415 14038 97.0 1.116 ! Near Maximum !
+02.0 104 74.46 3321 3429 68027 14271 97.7 1.080 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 106 75.92 3393 3579 73018 14478 98.4 1.046 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+06.0 108 77.38 3465 3732 78428 14657 98.9 1.012 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+08.0 110 78.84 3537 3888 84301 14807 99.4 0.980 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+10.0 112 80.30 3608 4047 90690 14926 99.7 0.949 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 102 73.00 3428 3653 77084 13934 99.9 1.025 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 102 73.00 3016 2827 50415 13341 89.4 1.231


Cartridge : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet : .284, 140, Nosler E-Tip 59955
Useable Case Capaci: 73.260 grain H2O = 4.757 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.290 inch = 83.57 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Hodgdon H1000

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-20.0 88 58.79 2502 1946 30941 10122 86.2 1.485
-18.0 90 60.26 2569 2052 33072 10503 87.8 1.446
-16.0 92 61.73 2638 2163 35371 10874 89.4 1.407
-14.0 95 63.20 2708 2279 37854 11232 90.9 1.368
-12.0 97 64.67 2778 2399 40540 11576 92.4 1.331
-10.0 99 66.14 2849 2523 43446 11901 93.7 1.293
-08.0 101 67.61 2921 2652 46598 12207 94.9 1.256
-06.0 103 69.08 2993 2785 50020 12489 96.0 1.220
-04.0 106 70.55 3066 2922 53724 12746 97.0 1.182
-02.0 108 72.02 3139 3063 57801 12976 97.9 1.142 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 110 73.49 3212 3208 62231 13174 98.6 1.103 ! Near Maximum !
+02.0 112 74.96 3286 3357 67080 13340 99.2 1.066 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 114 76.43 3360 3509 72402 13471 99.6 1.029 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+06.0 117 77.90 3434 3665 78257 13564 99.9 0.994 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+08.0 119 79.37 3507 3824 84715 13618 100.0 0.960 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+10.0 121 80.84 3581 3987 91869 13639 100.0 0.927 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 110 73.49 3382 3556 75622 12775 100.0 1.016 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 110 73.49 2979 2759 50666 12667 91.6 1.213


Cartridge : 7 mm Rem. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet : .284, 140, Nosler E-Tip 59955
Useable Case Capaci: 73.260 grain H2O = 4.757 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.290 inch = 83.57 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Hodgdon Retumbo

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-20.0 88 59.76 2457 1877 27980 10529 87.8 1.546
-18.0 90 61.25 2524 1980 29834 10945 89.6 1.507
-16.0 92 62.75 2592 2088 31829 11347 91.3 1.469
-14.0 95 64.24 2661 2201 33976 11730 92.9 1.431
-12.0 97 65.74 2731 2319 36292 12093 94.4 1.393
-10.0 99 67.23 2802 2440 38793 12430 95.7 1.356
-08.0 101 68.72 2873 2566 41493 12739 96.8 1.320
-06.0 103 70.22 2945 2695 44415 13017 97.8 1.284
-04.0 106 71.71 3016 2829 47581 13259 98.6 1.249
-02.0 108 73.21 3088 2965 51012 13464 99.3 1.214
+00.0 110 74.70 3160 3105 54745 13629 99.7 1.175
+02.0 112 76.19 3232 3247 58804 13751 99.9 1.136 ! Near Maximum !
+04.0 114 77.69 3303 3392 63235 13829 100.0 1.098 ! Near Maximum !
+06.0 117 79.18 3374 3539 68074 13891 100.0 1.062 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+08.0 119 80.68 3444 3688 73373 13947 100.0 1.026 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+10.0 121 82.17 3514 3839 79195 13996 100.0 0.992 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 110 74.70 3335 3458 67481 13029 100.0 1.074 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 110 74.70 2907 2628 44105 13246 93.2 1.287
 
I've never used the 140 grain anything in my 7 RM. However, I would think that the 140 grain E-Tip would give you superb performance in that cartridge. In fact, I may have to work on that this winter just to satisfy my curiosity. See what you've done? The bane of a hand loader is always trying a new combination of components. 'Tis a fine and pleasant misery, to paraphrase Pat McManus.
 
DrMike":vklcyg3z said:
I've never used the 140 grain anything in my 7 RM. However, I would think that the 140 grain E-Tip would give you superb performance in that cartridge. In fact, I may have to work on that this winter just to satisfy my curiosity. See what you've done? The bane of a hand loader is always trying a new combination of components. 'Tis a fine and pleasant misery, to paraphrase Pat McManus.

That's the problem with this place Mike. I was pretty darned happy running 140 PT's and H870 in my 7mm Rem Mag about 25 years ago until I learned I needed other stuff... Now I am surrounded by other stuff that I know works as good, but I am not sure any of it works better..... :lol:
 
Yeah, right now I'm bullet poor--hundreds of boxes of premium bullets and insufficient time to shoot them all. :( Then, I keep reading about another bullet (or powder) that I just have to have. Sheesh! A guy can't get a break. :?
 
You will Probably max out on Velocity at 3100fps using 140gr weight bullets in a 24" 7mm Rem Mag. I would first try H4831 If you can find some. It always seemed to get the best accuracy for me and the 140gr Ballistic tips I shot for many years. E-Tips Do like H1000 from my experience. Good luck with the Parker Hale, Great Rifles.
 
Thanks for the direction. The P-H is at the smith, seems that the front mounting holes are 8-40 while the rear are 6-32.

I have a bunch of loads prepped. The limiting factor is mag box length, sine I can't seem to reach the lands inside the box.

Looks like a worthy winter project.



P
 
Thanks for the direction. The P-H is at the smith, seems that the front mounting holes are 8-40 while the rear are 6-32.

I have a bunch of loads prepped. The limiting factor is mag box length, sine I can't seem to reach the lands inside the box.

Looks like a worthy winter project.



P
 
In my Vanguard Deluxe, those bullets do really well with 66.2 gr of 7828. I haven't chrony'd them, will do that this winter. The best I've done was a crack over .5" at 100 yards off a rest, three shot group, cooler weather seems to help the third shot. Can't get the 150 E-tips to work for anything so far. The one hog I shot at 75 yds. never knew what happened, bless his heart.
 
Several years ago I ran some FACTORY 140 gr Remingtons across the screens, and discovered to my delight, that they were clocking 3225 fps... :grin: With good accuracy. I liked that factory load. Did very little handloading with the 140's though. And the E-Tips came out after I sold the 700 ADL rifle I'd used...

Still have a deep respect for the 7mm Rem mag, though I no longer own one.

Guy
 
I have used 150 gr Etips with IMR 4350. I have some RL22 to do some load work up with this winter.

I have taken 2 elk with them and one weighed 148 grs on recovery and the other 149.2.
 
I have loaded lots of 140's for the .280 Rem but after blowing up a couple of small Texas whitetail with my first 7mm Rem Mag and 140 grain Speer's, I switched to 150/160 grain bullets for the 7mm Rem Mag in 1966. Too much of a good thing can be too much!
 
SJB358":79vqf7y0 said:
DrMike":79vqf7y0 said:
I've never used the 140 grain anything in my 7 RM. However, I would think that the 140 grain E-Tip would give you superb performance in that cartridge. In fact, I may have to work on that this winter just to satisfy my curiosity. See what you've done? The bane of a hand loader is always trying a new combination of components. 'Tis a fine and pleasant misery, to paraphrase Pat McManus.

That's the problem with this place Mike. I was pretty darned happy running 140 PT's and H870 in my 7mm Rem Mag about 25 years ago until I learned I needed other stuff... Now I am surrounded by other stuff that I know works as good, but I am not sure any of it works better..... :lol:

I feel the same way. My reloading area and gear cabinet looks like a LGS. What is worse is that I am not sure that it has made any difference. I do know that my Estate sale will be fully stocked and well attended.
 
C Broad Arrow":3hue0blt said:
I feel the same way. My reloading area and gear cabinet looks like a LGS. What is worse is that I am not sure that it has made any difference. I do know that my Estate sale will be fully stocked and well attended.

I can relate to that! :grin:
 
Back
Top